Volume 25, Issue 79 (12-2025)
jgs 2025, 25(79): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kadkhodaei Z, Rakhshani Nasab H, Rakhshani Nasab M. (2025). Check of virtual space in the tourism development of Konarak province. jgs. 25(79),
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4297-en.html
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4297-en.html
1- University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
2- University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran. ,rakhshaninasab_h@yahoo.com
2- University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran. ,
Abstract: (2691 Views)
One of the contemporary approaches to tourism is the use of virtual space and information technology in tourism, which has created a new attitude to tourism and removed the boundaries between the real world and virtual space. In this regard, the aim of the current research is to investigate the capabilities of virtual space in the development of tourism in Konarak County. This research is "applied" in terms of its purpose and "descriptive-analytical" in terms of its nature and method, and the method of collecting information is "documents and survey (questionnaire)". The statistical population under study is in the field of experts, and 35 people were selected as a sample using the two-stage Delphi method. The content validity of the questionnaire was calculated and confirmed by the professors and its reliability with Cronbach's alpha test at the level of 0.852. To analyze the data, a sample T-Tech test, path analysis and DEMATEL technique were used. The results of the sample T-Tech test showed that the virtual space with an average of 4.22 is more than the base limit (3), so the virtual space has influenced the tourism development of Konarak County. The results of the path analysis indicate that information technology infrastructure with a factor of /608 has the greatest impact and e-commerce with a factor of 250/ has the least impact on the tourism development of Konarak County. The results of the DEMATEL technique showed that among the indicators affecting the tourism of Konarak County, the telecommunication platform index with the value of 5.971 has the most interaction and the information index with the value of 5.671 has the least interaction, the social network index with the value of 1.402 is the most effective factor. And the telecommunication platform index with the value of 2.088 is the most influential factor. According to the results, it can be concluded that by creating technological infrastructure and introducing the attractions of Konarak County through programs such as (TV, news sites, etc.), an important step was taken in the direction of the development of this city.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
turism planing
References
1. اسماعیل زاده، سمیه؛ دل افروز، نرگس؛ قلیپور، علی؛ مولایی، نصرالله (1401). توسعه مقیاس اندازه گیری اعتماد گردشگران به یک مقصد گردشگری با استفاده از رویکرد آمیخته. مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 17(57): 30-331.
2. پورفرج، علیرضا؛ عیسی زاده روشن، یوسف؛ چراغی، کبری (1387). فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات، صنعت گردشگری، رشد اقتصادی. فصلنامه اقتصاد و تجارت نوین، 4(13): 66-46.
3. توسلی آرا، فائزه؛ طلیسچی غلامرضا؛ موسوی سیدجلیل؛ رضایی ناصر (1400). نقش بازنمایی معماری بر شکل گیری تصویر ذهنی مقصد گردشگران (مطالعه موردی: اقامتگاه های سنتی به شیوه نظریه داده بنیاد). مسکن و محیط روستا، ۴۰ (۱۷۳) :۱۶۱-۱۴۹.
4. خوش نیت، محمد (1392). بررسی مفهموم و ماهیت گردشگری الکترونیکی و توسعه پایدار. فصلنامه اطلاعات جغرافیایی سپهر، 22(85): 109-102.
5. درزیان عزیزی، عبدالهادی؛ هادیان فر، نیلوفر؛ مالکی، عالیه (1400). عوامل موثر بر پذیرش واقعیت مجازی در گرشدگری(براساس مدل پذیرش فناوری). مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 16(54): 311-279.
6. دلاور، علی؛ قادری، اسماعیل؛ مجدی، نیما (1394). جایگاه رسانه های اجتماعی در توسعه بازاریابی گردشگری الکترونیکی ایران. مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 9(28): 1-16.
7. راجی، زاهرا (1400). مروری بر پژوهش های صورت گرفته در حوزه گردشگری مجازی در ایران. جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، 4(2): 1-18.
8. رحیمی، علی؛ پاشاپور، حجت‌الله؛ ساریخانی، عادل (1401). آینده‌پژوهی عوامل بازدارنده توسعه گردشگری در شهرهای مرزی مطالعه موردی: شهرستان گرمی در استان اردبیل. پژوهش نامه مطالعات مرزی، 10(1): 69-88.
9. سیف الهی، ناصر؛ ناصرپور مهرداد(1401). تأثیر تبلیغات فضای مجازی بر انتخاب برند مقصد گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: استان اردبیل). مطالعات جغرافیایی مناطق کوهستانی، ۱۳ (۲) :۸۰-۶۱.
10. فکور ثقیه، امیرمحمد؛ حاجمندی، نرگس (1399). ارائه مدل مفهومی توسعه گردشگری الکترونیک ایران با استفاده از دیمتل فازی. گردشگری و توسعه، 9(2): 15-32.
11. کوکبی، لیلا؛ برمایه ور، بهنود. (1399). هم آفرینی فضای گردشگری هوشمند از طریق تعاملات دیجیتالی ارائه مدل مفهومی سایبر پارک. نشریه گردشگری شهری، 7(1): 51-67.
12. مشکینی، ابوالفضل؛ علیپور، سمیه؛ حاجی زاده، مریم (1397). ارزیابی تأثیر رسانه‌های مجازی در توسعه صنعت گردشگری از دیدگاه کاربران شبکه‌های مجازی. نشریه گردشگری شهری، 5(2): 53-69.
13. هادیان فر، نیلوفر؛ درزیان عزیزی، عبدالهادی (1400). تکنولوژی واقعیت مجازی در بازاریابی مقاصد گردشگری. مدیریت بازرگانی، 13(3): 743-721.
14. Ali, A., Frew , A. J. (2014). Technology innovation and applications in sustainable destination development. Information Technology & Tourism, 14(4): 265-290. [DOI:10.1007/s40558-014-0015-7]
15. Beck, J., Rainoldi, M., Egger, R. (2019). Virtual reality in tourism: a state-of-the-art review. Tourism Review, 74(3), 586-612. [DOI:10.1108/TR-03-2017-0049]
16. Buhalis, D. (2022). E-Tourism. In Encyclopedia of Tourism Management and Marketing. Edward Elgar Publishing. [DOI:10.4337/9781800377486] []
17. Buhalis, D., Law, R. (2008). Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20years on and 10 years after the Internet-The state of Tourism research. Tourism management, 29(4): 609-623. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.01.005]
18. Buhalis, D., O'Connor P. (2005). Information communication technology revolutionizing tourism. Tourism recreation research, 30(3): 7-16. [DOI:10.1080/02508281.2005.11081482]
19. Darzian Azizi, A., Hadian Far, N., Maliki, A. (2021). Factors affecting the acceptance of virtual reality in tourism (according to the technology acceptance model). Tourism Management Studies, 16(54): 279-311. (in Persian)
20. Delawar, A., Qadri, E., Magdi, N. (2015). The position of social media in the development of electronic tourism marketing in Iran. Tourism Management Studies, 9(28): 1-16. (in Persian)
21. Esmailzadeh, S., Del Afrooz, N., Qalipour, A., Moulai, N (2022). Developing a scale to measure tourists' trust in a tourist destination using a mixed approach. Tourism Management Studies, 17(57): 331-30. (in Persian)
22. Fakour Thaghieh, A.M., Hajmandi, N. (2019). Presenting a conceptual model of Iran's e-tourism development using Fuzzy Dimtel. Tourism and Development, 9(2): 15-32. (in Persian)
23. Hadian Far, N., Darzian Azizi, A.H. (2021). Virtual reality technology in tourism destination marketing. Business Administration, 13(3): 743-721. (in Persian)
24. Khoshnit, M. (2012). Examining the concept and nature of electronic tourism and sustainable development. Sepehr Geographical Information Quarterly, 22(85): 102-109. (in Persian)
25. Kokbi, L., Bermayevar, B. (2019). Co-creation of a smart tourism space through digital interactions, presenting a conceptual model of a cyber park. Journal of Urban Tourism, 7(1): 51-67. (in Persian)
26. Lee, P., Hunter, W. C., Chung, N. (2020). Smart tourism city: Developments and transformations. Sustainability, 12(10), 3958. [DOI:10.3390/su12103958]
27. Manghisi, V. M., Uva, A. E., Fiorentino, M., Gattullo, M., Boccaccio, A., Monno, G. (2018). Enhancing user engagement through the user centric design of a mid-air gesture-based interface for the navigation of virtual-tours in cultural heritage expositions. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 32, 186-197. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2018.02.014]
28. Mariani, M. M., Di Felice, M., Mura, M. (2016). Facebook as a destination marketing tool: Evidence from Italian regional Destination Management Organizations. Tourism management, 54, 321-343. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.12.008]
29. McLean, G., AlYahya, M., Barhorst, J. B., Osei-Frimpong, K. (2023). Examining the influence of virtual reality tourism on consumers' subjective wellbeing. Tourism Management Perspectives, 46, 101088. [DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101088]
30. Meshkini, A., Alipour, S., Hajizadeh, M. (2017). Evaluation of the impact of virtual media in the development of the tourism industry from the point of view of users of virtual networks. Journal of Urban Tourism, 5(2): 53-69. (in Persian)
31. Minazzi, R. (2015). Social media marketing in tourism and hospitality. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-05182-6]
32. Pathmanathan, P. R., El-Ebiary, Y. A. B., Yusoff, M. H., Aseh, K., Al-Qudah, O. M. A. A., Pande, B., Bamansoor, S. (2021). The Benefit and Impact of E-Commerce in Tourism Enterprises. In 2021 2nd International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise (ICSCEE). pp. 193-198. [DOI:10.1109/ICSCEE50312.2021.9497947]
33. Pestek, A., Sarvan, M. (2020). Virtual reality and modern tourism. Journal of Tourism Futures, 7(2), 245-250. [DOI:10.1108/JTF-01-2020-0004]
34. Porfaraj, A., Isazadeh Roshan, Y., Chiraghi, K. (2008). Information and communication technology, tourism industry, economic growth. Modern Economics and Business Quarterly, 4(13): 46-66. (in Persian)
35. Rahimi, A., Pashapour, H., Sarikhani, A. (2022). Prospective study of factors hindering the development of tourism in border cities, a case study: Garmi city in Ardabil province. Journal of Border Studies, 10(1): 69-88. (in Persian)
36. Raji, Z. (2021). An overview of the research conducted in the field of virtual tourism in Iran. Geography and Human Relations, 4(2): 1-18. (in Persian)
37. Seif Elahi, N., Naserpour, M. (2022). The effect of cyberspace advertising on the choice of tourism destination brand (case study: Ardabil province). Geographical studies of mountainous regions, 13 (2): 61-80. (in Persian)
38. Tavasli Ara, F., Talischi, Gh., Mousavi, S.J., Rezaei, N. (2021). The role of architectural representation on the formation of the mental image of tourists' destination (case study: traditional residences according to the foundation's data theory). Housing and Village Environment, 40 (173):161-149. (in Persian)
39. Tussyadiah, I. P., Wang, D., Jung, T. H., tom Dieck, M. C. (2018). Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from tourism. Tourism Management, 66, 140-154. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.003]
40. Ulfa, K., Pribadi, U. (2021). March(. Implementation of E-Tourism in Aceh Province for Future Sustainable Development through Media Promotion. In IOP Conference Series: [DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/717/1/012015]
41. Verma, S., Warrier, L., Bolia, B., Mehta, S. (2022). Past, present, and future of virtual tourism-a literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100085. [DOI:10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100085]
42. Weaver, D. B., Lawton, L. J. (2007). Twenty years on: The state of contemporary ecotourism research. Tourism management, 28(5), 1168-1179. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.03.004]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)