Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Prioritization of Inside Urban Space Indicators Using Delphi Method (Case study: Gorgan City)

Authors
Fateme Hajizade 1
Seyed Hamed Mirkarimi 2
Abdorassuol Salman Mahini 3
Marjan Mohammadzade 2
1 PhD student, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences
10.61186/jgs.24.74.1
Abstract
Cities are open systems that constantly change and bring about changes in inside and outside neighboring areas. With the rapid growth of urban population in the world, cities sprawl and occupy surrounding lands. In this situation, attention to the developments inside urban space could be a key principle in urban planning. The aim of this study was determining and prioritizing economic, social and ecological factors which influence inside urban space indicators in City of Gorgan using Delphi method and literature review. Following the increase in population, developments inside urban space in the future is inevitable. Understanding and recognition of this process is essential to effective management in the field of conservation of the urban environment. Four expertize requirements should be taken into account: knowledge and experience of the field of study; ability and willingness to participate; adequate time to participate; and effective communication skills. Experts’ panel included fifteen specialists from municipality, city council, academics, cultural and medical service providers, police, urban planners and citizens, whose points of view were collected using questionnaires. Data collection for questionnaire was repeated 4 times to reach a consensus. Overall, twenty - four factors were identified for the economic, social and ecological factors, and then the degree and percentage of importance for each one was determined. Results showed that the most important indicator is feeling of security followed by the noise pollution and environmental pollution. Results could be helpful to urban planners and related organizations to improve inside urban space for welfare and life quality of citizens. Prioritization of these indicators provides an appropriate action agenda for the managers.
Keywords
DELPHI method
factor
Inside urban space development
Questionnaire
Alshehri SA, Li Y, Rezgui H. 2015. Delphi-based consensus study into a framework of community resilience to disaster, Nat Hazards, 75: 2221–2245. DOI:10.1007/s11069-014-1423-x.
Browne N, Robinson L, Richardson A. 2002. A Delphi study on the research priorities of European oncology nurses, European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 6(3):133-144. DOI:10.1054/ejon.2002.0191.
Chu H, Hwang GJ. 2008. A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts, Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4): 2826-2840.
Danladi musa H, Rusli Yacob M, Makmom Abdullah A, Yusoff Ishak M. 2015. Delphi Method of Developing Environmental Wellbeing Indicators for the Evaluation of Urban Sustainability in Malaysia, Procedia, Environmental Sciences, 30: 244 – 249. DOI:10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.044.
Donohoe H. 2011. Defining culturally sensitive ecotourism: a Delphi consensus, Current Issues in Tourism, 27–45. DOI:10.1080/13683500903440689.
EEA -European Environment Agency- (2005). 2005. The European environment –State and outlook 2005, Executive summary, 8. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state_of_environment_report_2005_1.
Geist M. 2010. Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies, Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(2): 147–154. DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.006.
Hasanzadeh M, Danehkar A, Pak A. 2012. Application of Delphi method for criteria selection in site survey of oil jetties in Iran, Environment and Natural Resources Research, 2(1): 119-128. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v2n1p119.
Hasson F, Keeney S. 2011. Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9): 1695–1704. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005.
Landeta J. 2006. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(5): 467-482.
Linstone H, Turoff M. 2011. Delphi: A brief look backward and forward, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9): 1712–1719. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.011.
Rådestad M, Jirwe M, Castrén M, Svensson L, Gryth D, Rüter A. 2013. Essential key indicators for disaster medical response suggested to be included in a national uniform protocol for documentation of major incidents: a Delphi study, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 21(68): 1–11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24025366. DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-68.
Sharifi N, Danehkar A, Etemad V, Mahmoudi B. 2011. Identification and prioritization of criteria used for selecting protected areas in forest ecosystems case study: Iran's Hyrcanian forests, Environment and Natural Resources Research, 1(1): 189- 200. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v1n1p189.
Sourani A, Sohail M. 2014. The Delphi Method: review and use in construction management research, International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 11(1): 1–23. DOI:10.1080/15578771.2014.917132.
Van Teijlingen E, Pitchforth E, Bishop C, Russell E. 2006. Delphi method and nominal group technique in family planning and reproductive health research, Fam Plann Reprod Health Care, 32(4): 249-252. DOI: 10.1783/147118906778586598.
Windle PE. 2004. Delphi technique: assessing component needs, American Society of Peri Anesthesia Nurses, 19(1): 46-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2003.11.005.