Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Explaining the Role of Geopolitical Components Affecting spatial planning of border regions (Case Study: West Azarbaijan Province)

Authors
1 urmia University
2 University of Bonab
3 M.Sc. in Geograph, urmia University
Abstract
The present study aims at identifying geopolitical components affecting the spatial planning of border regions in the East Azarbaijan province. The research is an applied research that has been carried out using statistical tests, path analysis and Promethean decision making model. The results of the research showed that social variables with r = 0.811, r = 0.662, political, r = 0.851, ranked first to third. The results of path analysis also showed that political components with 0.96, social and cultural components with 0.93 and economic components with 0.36, have a direct effect on the realization of eastern Azarbaijan province boundaries. Finally, the results of the Prometheus model showed that Sardasht, Maku, Oshnaviyeh, Piranshahr, Orumiyeh, Salmas, Khoy, Siah Cheshmeh and Sardasht, respectively, are in the first to the nineteenth priorities. Therefore, according to the findings of the research, it is suggested that security and security measures are implemented with economic, political, and socio-cultural approaches.
Keywords

Carter, D. B. and P. Poast (2017). Why do states build walls? Political economy, security, and border stability. Journal of conflict resolution, 61(2): 239-270.
Chambers, P. (2015). The embrace of border security: Maritime jurisdiction, national sovereignty, and the geopolitics of operation sovereign borders. Geopolitics, 20(2): 404-437.
Cornelissen, R. (2018). Regulation 1231/2010 on the inclusion of third-country nationals in EU social security coordination: Reach, limits and challenges. European Journal of Social Security, 20(2): 86-99.
Dupeyron, B. (2017). Secondary foreign policy’through the prism of cross-border governance in the US–Canada Pacific Northwest border region. Regional & Federal Studies, 27(3): 321-340.
Garrett, T. M. (2018). Where There's a Wall There's a Way: The End of Democratic Discourse regarding Immigration and Border Security Policy. Md. J. Int'l L. 33: 183.
Jeandesboz, J. (2016). Smartening border security in the European Union: An associational inquiry. Security Dialogue. 47(4): 292-309.
Lee, S.-O., J. Wainwright and J. Glassman (2018). Geopolitical economy and the production of territory: The case of US–China geopolitical-economic competition in Asia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(2): 416-436.
Shadzhe, A., I. Karabulatova, R. Khunagov and Z. Zhade (2016). Ethnopolitical Influence in Regulating National Security In Border Territories Of The Countries In The Caucasian-Caspian Region. Central Asia & the Caucasus, (14046091) 17(3).
Taft-Morales, M. (2018). Guatemala: Political, Security, and SocioEconomic Conditions and US Relations, Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service.
Taylor, P.(1994). Political Geography, England : Langman Scientific & Technical.
Tholens, S. (2017). Border management in an era of ‘statebuilding lite’: security assistance and Lebanon's hybrid sovereignty. International Affairs, 93(4): 865-882.
Williams, J. M. (2016). The safety/security nexus and the humanitarianisation of border enforcement. The Geographical Journal, 182(1): 27-37.
Zupančič, J., J. A. Wendt and A. Ilieş (2018). An outline of border changes in the area between the Baltic and the Mediterranean: their geopolitical implications and classification. Geographia Polonica, 91(1): 33-46.