Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

View of intra-city differences and its position in explaining the factors affecting the identity of urban space using logistic and differentiation methods. Case study: West and East regions of Mashhad

Author
mostafa amirfakhriyan
10.52547/jgs.21.61.201
Abstract
Identity, as a complex concept, influenced by a variety of factors, makes one thing distinct and unique. Meanwhile, the characteristics of the environment, habits, worldview, cultural characteristics, etc., have a growing influence on the formation of these indices of identity. In other words, this study seeks to investigate the hypothesis of the difference in attitudes of inhabitants of the eastern and western parts of Mashhad towards urban identity indices and, finally, whether the distinction is observable or not? The basis of this study is based on quantitative methods that have been used for research purposes, along with qualitative methods. The output of this discussion is to achieve the identity of the city and its classification according to the purpose of the study. But in the small part, the study method is based on the use of differentiation and logistic models to show the type and level of differences between the eastern and western parts of Mashhad. Based on this, the rank of indicators of urban identity components was obtained in the form of a questionnaire in two categories of eastern regions (regions 4, 5 and 6) and western regions (including 1, 9 and 11) from the residents' perspective. The completed questionnaires were entered into the statistical database and analyzed using statistical software such as Excel and Spas. Study shoes that: 1- Regarding the formic index, studies show that variables such as high buildings, traditional architecture and natural form of place are variables that cause segregation of residents of eastern and western parts of Mashhad. 2- The results in Function indices also indicate that variables of vibrant places, places with activities, boarding times, places with different uses, and safe places are meaningful. 3- Finally, regarding the semantic indices, the effective and differentiating variables in the eastern and western regions of Mashhad, including two variables of understanding the sense of pilgrimage and understanding the characteristics of Islamic culture. Accordingly, it can be said that the attitudes of residents of the studied areas are different from those related to the sense of pilgrimage and the characteristics of Islamic culture in their. the end

Keywords
identity
analysis of differentiation
logistic analysis
areas of Mashhad
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I. and Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language, Oxford University Press, New York. University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
Hirt, S. A. (2005). Toward Postmodern Urbanism? Evolution of Planning in Cleveland, Ohio. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25: 27-42.
Rapoport,A, (1990), Levels of Meaning and Types of Environments”. In Y.Yoshitake,r. B. Bechtel, T. Takahashi, & M. Asia(Eds), Current issues in environment.behavior research
Rashid, H. (2012). Identity Discourse in Islamic Architecture. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 2(1): 926-934.
Sak, S. (2008). FORMATION OF THE CITY IMAGE: THE ROLE OF THE TRAIN STATION IN THE IMAGE FORMATION PROCESS OF ANKARA. Approved by the Institute of Fine Arts.
Shalom H. Schwartz(2012) ,Basic Human Values: An Overview, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Sidawi, B. (2013). Understanding the vocabulary of the Islamic architectural heritage. GBER Vol. 8 Issue. 2 : 26 - 39.
YILDIZ, Ş. (2011). What Does Make a City Islamic? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 )8( :199-201.

6- Partovi, P, (2003), Place and Spot: A Phenomenological Approach, the Magazine of Fine Arts, Vol14, pp:40-50.
7- Taban,P- Pourjafar, M, Pourmand, H, (2012), Identity and location, phenomenological approach, city identity, Vol 6, No 10.
8- Jeicobs, J, (1969), The deaths and lives of big American cities, Tehran, Tehran University press.
9- Habibi, M, (2006), Az shar ta shahr, Tehran, Tehran University press.
10- Daneshpour, A, (2001), Recognition of the concept of identity in public space,Tehran, Tehran University press.
11- Rahnama, M, (1997), Old texture and urban development ", a sample of residential buildings in downtown Mashhad, Tehran, Tarbiatmodares University press.
12- Khorasan Razavi Cultural Heritage Organization, (2009), Tourist agency statistics, Mashhad.
13- Kalen, G, (1998), Urban Landscape, Tehran, Tehran University press.
14- Shahnoush, Nasser (2006), Determination of the Development Level of Mashhad Townships, Municipality of Mashhad, Conference on Urban Planning and Management. Mashhad, Municipality of Mashhad. Pages 560-575.
15- Master Plan of Mashhad City (1346), Mashhad: Khorasan Razavi Housing and Urban Development Organization.
16- Ali Abadi, M. (1391). The Position of Reason in the Concept of City Sustainability. Iranian Journal of Architecture Studies Quarterly Journal of Spring and Summer 2012, 25-37.
17- Ghamami, Majid (1993), Master Plan of Mashhad », Quarterly Journal of the Ninth, Third Year, Pages 70-80.
18- Kamiili, Mohammad, 2008, Understanding the Identity of Bandar Abbas, Safavi: Spring and Summer 2008, Volume 17, Issue.
19- Grötter, York, 2004, Aesthetics, Architecture - Composition, Fitness, etc., Architecture - Philosophy, Translation: Jahanshah Pakzad and Abdolreza Homayoun, Shahid Beheshti University Departments, Tehran.
20- Farnaneh Consulting Engineers (2007), Landscape and General Patterns of Mashhad Metropolis Development, Mashhad, Mashhad: Housing and Urban Development Organization.
21- Statistics Center of Iran, Statistics of 2011.
22- Hammami, A., and Moghimi, Z. (1389). Quranic Approach in Comparison of the Theory of Relativity of Law and the Relativity of Values. Quran and Hadith No 7 Journal of Summer and Autumn, 1991-110.
References (in English):
32. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I. and Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language, Oxford University Press, New York. University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
33. Hirt, S. A. (2005). Toward Postmodern Urbanism? Evolution of Planning in Cleveland, Ohio. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25, 27-42.
34. Rapoport,A, 1990, Levels of Meaning and Types of Environments”. In Y.Yoshitake,r. B. Bechtel, T. Takahashi, & M. Asia(Eds), Current issues in environment.behavior research(pp 135-147).
35. Rashid, H. (2012). Identity Discourse in Islamic Architecture. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 2(1), 2012, 926-934.
36. Sak, S. (2008). FORMATION OF THE CITY IMAGE: THE ROLE OF THE TRAIN STATION IN THE IMAGE FORMATION PROCESS OF ANKARA. Approved by the Institute of Fine Arts.
37. Shalom H. Schwartz(2012) ,Basic Human Values: An Overview, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
38. Sidawi, B. (2013). Understanding the vocabulary of the Islamic architectural heritage. GBER Vol. 8 Issue. 2 pp , 26 - 39.
39. YILDIZ, Ş. (2011). What Does Make a City Islamic? International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2 No. 8; May 2011, 199-201.