Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Geotourism study of Ghezelowzan basin based on Fassoulas method

Authors
1 Assistant Professor of physical geography, University of Zanjan
2 University of Zanjan
Abstract
Iran's vast country has different geographic conditions. As of the thirteen known climates in the world, it has eleven types. This has made many environmental, natural, recreational and economic benefits. The purpose of this study was to investigate, identify and introduce the geotouristic capabilities of Ghezelowzan Basin based on the Fassoulas method. The catchment area of the Ghezelowzan is a landform of various quaternary processes that are changing. Identification of geosite plays an important role in explaining quaternary developments. The research methodology is based on description and analysis, which is described as a field study of the library to describe and describe the region. The selected geosites were then positioned on topographic maps of 1/50000 and using geological maps of 1/100000 of the region, the lithology of different landforms such as hoodoos, Behestan dom, salt domes Chehrabad, Pari lakes, copper mine Baiche Bagh, dikes Sedimentary, cuesta-like forms, kalut-like shapes, Kcadovan-like shaped forms, glacier circuses, and tectonic valleys-fridges. After identifying landforms, one of the most common and comprehensive geotouristic models called Fassoulas was used. The criteria defined in this model were defined in six main categories: scientific, ecological, conservation, cultural, aesthetic, economic and potential use. By assessing landforms in this model, it was determined that the chimneys of the Jen, Behestan, dome, Darband Ghaterchi valley and salt Dome of Chehar Abad were selected as the most suitable geocites for obtaining the maximum scientific and ecological score, while the Belogice glacier landform was also the lowest.
Keywords

Brilha, J. (2016). Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage, 8(2), 119-134.
Buckley, R. (2011). Tourism and environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 397-416.
Fassoulas, C., Mouriki, D., Dimitriou-Nikolakis, P., & Iliopoulos, G. (2012). Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage, 4(3), 177-193.
Henriques, M. H., & dos Reis, R. P. (2015). Framing the palaeontological heritage within the geological heritage: an integrative vision. Geoheritage, 7(3), 249-259.
Hose, T. A. (2011). The English origins of geotourism (as a vehicle for geoconservation) and their relevance to current studies. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 51(2), 343-359.
Mashal, M., Kamel, S. R., Sahebari, S. S., Fard, M. D., Moradi, A., Khounchin, S., & Abbasi, S. (2012). Investigation of Hour Alazim wetland geotourism capabilities. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(7), 226-230.
Miccadei, E., Piacentini, T., & Esposito, G. (2011). Geomorphosites and geotourism in the parks of the Abruzzo region (Central Italy). Geoheritage, 3(3), 233-251.
Newsome, D., Dowling, R., & Leung, Y. F. (2012). The nature and management of geotourism: A case study of two established iconic geotourism destinations. Tourism management perspectives, 2, 19-27.
Taherpour, K. A. M., Fazel, V. M. I., Torshizian, H. A., Taherpour, K. A. V., & Asmaryan, S. (2012). The geotourism potential investigations in Kashmar area, Khorasan-e-razavi province, NE Iran. Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences, 4: 51-60.
Turner, S. (2013). Geoheritage and geoparks: One (Australian) woman’s point of view. Geoheritage, 5(4), 249-264.
Ulloa, A., & Goicoechea, C. (2013). Geotourism potential of underground sites in Costa Rica. Tourism and Karst Areas, 6(1), 43-56.
Yazdi, A. (2013). Qeshm Island of Iran, National Academy of Geotourism Development Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3(2): 405-411.
Yazdi, A., Emami, M. H., & Jafari, H. R. (2013). IRAN, the center of geo-tourism potentials. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3, 458-465.