تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

بررسی عوامل و محرک‌های تغییر الگوی معیشت روستاهای مناطق مرزی (مورد مطالعه: دهستان مینان، شهرستان سرباز)

نویسندگان
جواد بذرافشان
مهرشاد طولابی نژاد
نجمه حملی
دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان
10.29252/jgs.18.49.127
چکیده
در این پژوهش به بررسی عوامل و محرک­های تغییر الگوی معیشت روستاهای مرزی پرداخته شد. تحقیق حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و روش انجام آن، توصیفی- تحلیلی است. ابزار گردآوری داده­ها، پرسش­نامه و مصاحبه بوده است. جامعه آماری خانوارهای روستایی دهستان مینان در شهرستان مرزی سرباز می­باشد (4544N=). با استفاده از فرمول کوکران و به روش نمونه­گیری سهمیه­ای 354 خانوار به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها از آزمون­های t تک­نمونه­ای، کای­دو و مدل لجستیک استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که از بین 354 پاسخگو، 72/88 درصد معتقد بودند که الگوی معیشت آن­ها تغییر پیدا کرده و 27/12 درصد معتقد بودند که الگوی معیشتی آنها تغییری نداشته است. از بین 45 متغیر مورد نظر پژوهش، 15 متغیر به طور قابل توجهی ارتباط معنی­داری با تغییر معیشت داشته است. عوامل اقتصادی (0/400)، شخصی (0/360) و انزوای جغرافیایی (0/312) ارتباط بیشتری با تغییر معیشت داشته­اند. همچنین در واکنش به این تغییر معیشت، از 345 پاسخگو، 39/8 درصد قاچاق سوخت و کالا ، 25/4 تجارت و معامله و 22/9 درصد انجام کارهای خدماتی را برای امرار معاش انتخاب نموده­اند. لذا می­ توان گفت ایجاد زمینه­های مناسب برای امرار معاش خارج از مزرعه مانند صنایع­روستایی و صنایع­دستی می­تواند ضمن تنوع امرار معاش، از تغییر معیشت و استفاده از راه­های نامشروع و خطرناک برای این امر جلوگیری کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تغییر معیشت
معیشت پایدار
مناطق مرزی
مدل لجستیک
شهرستان سرباز

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating Factors and Drivers of Livelihoods Change in Rural Households in Border Regions (Case Study: Minan district, Sarbaz township)

نویسندگان English

Javad Bazrafshan
Mehrshad Toulabi Nejad
Najmeh Hamli
Assistant Professor of Geography and Rural Planning, Sistani and Baluchistan University, Iran .
چکیده English

This study explored the factors and drivers of livelihood pattern change in rural households through sustainable livelihoods Approach. The study was considered applicable and used a descriptive-analytic method. To collect the data, questionnaire and interview instruments were utilized. The statistical population was Minan rural households in Sarbaz border province (N=4544). Using Cochran’s sampling technique, 354 households were selected as the participants of the study. One sample t-test, chi-square, and logistic model were used for data analysis. Findings revealed that out of 354 respondents, 72.88 % believed their livelihood pattern had changed and 27.12% supposed no change. 15 out of 45 variables under study were considerably effective and had significant relationships with livelihood variable. Economical (0.400), personal (0.360), and geographical isolation (0.312) factors played major roles in this regard. Moreover, it indicated that out of 354 respondents, 39.8% assumed that they had chosen fuel smuggling, 25.4 % goods trading, and 22.9 % service works as a reaction to this livelihood change for the living. Thus, it can be argued that integrated rural livelihood and accessible proper foundations for subsistence outside the farms (such as rural industries) can diversify living and prevent both livelihood change and use of illicit and hazardous activities, for instance, fuel and goods smuggling.




#s3gt_translate_tooltip_mini { display: none !important; }

کلیدواژه‌ها English

: Livelihood change
living variation
border regions
logistic model
Sarbaz Township
6. Adimassu. Z, Kessler. A, Yirga. C and Leo Stroosnijder, (2013), Farmers’ Perceptions of Land Degradation and Their Investments in Land Management: A Case Study in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia, Environmental Management, Volume 51, Issue 5, pp 989-998.
7. Andersson Djurfeldt, A., Djurfeldt, G., & Lodin, J. B. (2013). Geography of gender gaps: Regional patterns of income and farm–nonfarm interaction among male- and female-headed households in eight African countries. World Development, Volume 48, pp 32–47.
8. Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., & Webb, P. (2001). Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: Concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 315- 331.
9. Bezu, S., & Barrett, C. B. (2012). Employment dynamics in the rural nonfarm sector in Ethiopia: Do the poor have time on their side? Journal of Development Studies, Volume 48, Issue 9, pp 1223- 1240.
10. Bhandari, P.B., (2013), rural livelihood change? Household capital, community resources and livelihood transition, Journal of Rural Studies, Volume 32, pp 126- 136.
11. Bowen, S., & De Master, K. De (2011). New rural livelihoods or museums of production? Quality food initiatives in practice. Journal of Rural Studies, Volume 27, pp 73- 82.
12. Busse, H. A. Jogo, W. Fofanah, M. Tesfay, H. Hadush, M. Kiflom, E. and Schulz, S. (2017), Participatory Assessment of Factors Influencing Nutrition and Livelihoods in Rural Ethiopia: Implications for Measuring Impacts of Multisector Nutrition Programs, Food and Nutrition Bulletin, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 468- 484
13. Davis, B., winters, P., Reardon, T., & Stamoulis, K. (2009). Rural nonfarm employment and farming: Household-level linkages. Agricultural Economics, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 119- 123.
14. Dercon, S. (2002). Income risk, coping strategies, and safety nets. The World Bank Research Observer, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 141- 166.
15. DFID, (1999), Sustainable Livelihood Guidance Sheets. DFID, London, UK.
16. Ellis, F. (1998). Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp1–38.
17. Ellis, F. (2000). The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 289–302.
18. FAO, (2005), Rapid Guide for Missions: Analyzing Local Institutions and Livelihoods, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy, ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/a0273e/a0273e00.pdf.
19. Garibaldi. L. A, Gemmill-Herren. B, D’Annolfo. R, Graeub. B. E, Cunningham. S. A and Breeze. T. D, (2017), Farming Approaches for Greater Biodiversity, Livelihoods, and Food Security, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 68- 80.
20. Gentle. P, Maraseni. T. N, (2012), Climate change, poverty and livelihoods: adaptation practices by rural mountain communities in Nepal, Environmental Science and Policy 21, Volume 15, lssue1, pp 24– 34.
21. Haggblade, S., Hazell, P. B. R., & Reardon, T. (2007). Transforming the rural nonfarm economy: Opportunities and threats in the developing world (490 p). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Instititue.
22. Hilson, G. (2016). Farming, small-scale mining and rural livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa: A critical overview. The Extractive Industries and Society, Volume 3, pp 547- 563
23. Huber, F.K., Yang, Y., Weckerle, C.S. and Seeland, K., (2014), Diversification of livelihoods in a society in transition: a case study of Tibetan Communities in Southwest China, Journal Society and Natural Resources, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 706- 723.
24. Hurni. H, Molden. D, Zimmermann. A, Wymann von Dach. S and Sarah-Lan Mathez-Stiefel, (2016), Focus Issue: Modernization and Sustainable Development in Mountains, Mountain Research and Development, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 129- 139.
25. Kifle. S, Teferi. B, Kebedom. A and Abiyot Legesse, (2016), Factors Influencing Farmers Decision on the Use of Introduced Soil and Water Conservation Practices in the Lowland’s of Wenago Woreda, Gedeo Zone, Ethiopia, American Journal of Rural, Volume 4, Issue 1 ,pp 24-30.
26. Lay, J., Mahmoud, T. O., & M’Mukaria, G. M. (2008). Few opportunities, much desperation: The dichotomy of non-agricultural activities and inequality in Western Kenya. World Development, Volume 36, Issue 12, pp 2713- 2732.
27. Liu, Z., and Liu, L. (2016). Characteristics and driving factors of rural livelihood transition in the east coastal region of China: A case study of suburban Shanghai. Journal of Rural Studies, Volume 43, pp 145–158.
28. Loison, S. A, (2015). Rural livelihood diversification in Sub-Saharan Africa: A literature review rural livelihood diversification in Sub-Saharan Africa: A literature review. The Journal of Development Studies, Volume 51, Issue 9, pp 1125- 1138.
29. Losch, B., Magrin, G., & Imbernon, J. (2013). A new emerging rural world: An overview of rural change in Africa. Montpellier: CIRAD.
30. Lu. H, McComas. A. and Besley. J. C, (2017), Messages promoting genetic modification of crops in the context of climate change: Evidence for psychological reactan, Appetite, Volume 108, pp 104- 116.
31. Makita, R. (2016). Livelihood diversification with certification-supported farming: The case of land reform beneficiaries in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, Volume 57, pp 44- 59.
32. Martin, S. M., and Lorenzen, K. A. I. (2016). Livelihood diversification in rural Laos. World Development, Volume 83, pp 231- 243.
33. Mbaiwaa, J.E. and Stronzab, A. (2010). The effects of tourism development on rural livelihoods in the Okavango Delta, Botswana, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 635-656.
34. Mushongah, J., Scoones, I., (2012), Livelihood change in rural Zimbabwe over 20 years. Journal of Development Studies, Volume 48, pp 1241- 1257.
35. Niehof, A. (2004). The significance of diversification for rural livelihood systems. Food Policy, Volume 29, pp 321- 338.
36. Peng, W. Zheng, H. Robinson, B. E, Li, C. and Wang, F. (2017), Household Livelihood Strategy Choices, Impact Factors, and Environmental Consequences in Miyun Reservoir Watershed, China, Sustainability, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 175- 187
37. Reardon, T., & Taylor, J. E. (1996). Agroclimatic shock, income inequality, and poverty: Evidence from Burkina Faso. World Development, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 901- 914.
38. Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 171- 196.
39. Shen, F., (2009), Tourism and Sustainable Livelihoods Approach: Application within the Chinese context, Ph.D. thesis, Lincoln university.
40. Sherren, K., Loik, L., and Debner, J. A. (2016). Climate adaptation in “new world” cultural landscapes: The case of Bay of Fundy agricultural dykelands (Nova Scotia, Canada). Land Use Policy, Volume 51, pp 267- 280.
41. Smith, D. R., Gordon, A., Meadows, K., & Zwick, K. (2001). Livelihood diversification in Uganda: Patterns and determinants of change across two rural districts. Food Policy, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 421- 435.
42. Teshome, A., Graaff, J. D., Ritsema, C. and Kassie, M., (2014), farmers' perceptions about the influence of land quality Land Fragmention and tenure systems on sustainable land management in the north western Ethiopian Highlands, land degradation & development, Volume. 27, Issue. 4, pp. 884- 898.
43. Vedeld, P., Jumane, A., Wapalila, G., & Songorwa, A. (2012). Protected areas, poverty and conflicts: A livelihood case study of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics, Volume 21, pp 20- 31.
44. Walelign. S. Z, Pouliot. M, Larsen. H. O, and Smith-Hall. C, (2016), Combining Household Income and Asset Data to Identify Livelihood Strategies and Their Dynamics, Journal The Journal of Development Studies, Volume 53, Issue 6, pp 769- 787.
45. Wang, N., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., and Li, X. (2016), Adoption of ecofriendly soil-management practices by smallholder farmers in Shandong Province of China, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Volume 62, pp 185- 193.
46. Winters, P., Essam, T., Zezza, A., Davis, B., & Carletto, C. (2010). Patterns of rural development: A cross-country comparison using microeconomic data. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 628- 651.
47. Worku Kassie. G., (2017), The Nexus between livelihood diversification and farmland management strategies in rural Ethiopia, Journal Cogent Economics and Finance, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 1- 16.
48. Yaro, J. A. (2006). Is deagrarianisation real? A study of livelihood activities in rural northern Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 125- 156.