Volume 25, Issue 78 (9-2025)
jgs 2025, 25(78): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
salehabadi R, Hafez Nia M. (2025). Investigating the evolution of discourse and scientific development during the transition of the governments of the Islamic Republic of Iran. jgs. 25(78), doi:10.61186/jgs.25.78.18
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4308-en.html
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4308-en.html
1- Tarbiat Modares University, Tarbiat Modares University , Reyhane.salehabadi@modares.ac.ir
2- Professor of political geography at Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran., Tarbiat Modares University
2- Professor of political geography at Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran., Tarbiat Modares University
Abstract: (1247 Views)
After the victory of the Islamic revolution, a new form of attitude towards science and technology was formed in Iran. This scientific discourse was directly influenced by the Islamic revolution and Islamic ideology and formulated new values and goals for the development of science and technology. After the revolution, since the statesmen considered science and technology as one of the key factors for the development and excellence of the society, they formed scientific policies and plans in order to realize the revolutionary and Islamic goals. This attitude towards science and technology in Iran during that period had a significant impact on the country's scientific and technological development. Considering the fact that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been at the helm of scientific leadership in the region after 1357, Iran and its role in the development of scientific power in post-revolution governments. In order to achieve this goal, the descriptive-analytical method and reliable statistics in domestic and foreign sources were used. The findings of the research showed that the type of discourse in different governments includes focusing on industrialization through the substitution of imports and capital resources (1360-1368), modernization and institutionalism and focusing on advanced technologies (1376-1368), focusing on technologies advanced, innovation and export development, and social justice mainly relying on knowledge industries (1384-1376), focusing on the transition of the industry towards knowledge-based innovation in the economy (1384-1392) and emphasizing the increase of international cooperation with an emphasis on identity and Rationality was in compilation and implementation (1392-1400). The results of the research show that in each period, according to the dominant discourse, measures such as the development of higher education and scientific research, the establishment of universities and research centers, and the creation of domestic and international scientific networks can be mentioned.
Keywords: scientific discourse and development, Iran's Islamic Revolution, governments, scientific power
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Political geography
References
1. اولیایی، علی اکبر (1388).جنبش‌های اجتماعی و تحلیل گفتمان، ماهنامه زمانه، 72 (1388)، 29
2. احمدوند، عماد، قربانعلی، امیر، عالمی، علیرضا (1399). ماهنامه فنّاوری نانو،145
3. حافظ نیا، محمدرضا، صالح آبادی، ریحانه (1399). بهینه سازی مدل سنجش قدرت ملی کشورها، رساله دکتری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
4. حافظ نیا محمدرضا، زرقانی سید هادی، احمدی پور زهرا، رکن الدین افتخاری عبدالرضا (1385). طراحی مدل سنجش قدرت ملی کشورها، فصلنامه ژئوپلیتیک، 2(2).
5. حافظ نیا محمدرضا (1394). مختصات نظام و ساختار علمی نظریه خیز و نقد ساختار علمی کشور، جزوه درسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس: تهران
6. حافظ‌نیا محمدرضا، احمدی پور، زهرا، بدیعی مرجان (1381). تحلیل مبانی جغرافیایی قدرت ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی. ۱۳۸۱; ۱ (۱) :۴۷-۶۷
7. حافظ‌نیا محمدرضا (1376). ژئوپلیتیک جزوه درسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس: تهران
8. خراباتی، علی (1387). اسلام سیاسی و جهانی‌شدن، فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی، 14(1387)، 83
9. زرقانی سید هادی (1389)، نقد و تحلیل مد ل های سنجش قدرت ملی، فصلنامه ژئوپلیتیک، 6(1).
10. زرقانی، هادی (1393). سنجش و رتبه‌بندی قدرت ملی کشورها در جهان اسلام. جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی جهان اسلام, 1(2), 1-26.
11. مصباح یزدی، محمدتقی (1367). آموزش فرهنگی، قم: مؤسسه آموزش و پژوهش امام‌خمینی.
12. معاونت علمی و فنّاوری ریاست جمهوری (1396). پایگاه اینترنتی معاونت علمی و فناوری
13. هدایتی، محمد، احمدوند، علی ، حاتمی، حسین (1392). جایگاه علم و فناوری در قدرت جهان اسلام با تاکید بر جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه آفاق امنیت, 6(18).
14. Astakhova, E. V., Reshetnyak, E. I., & Ilchenko, V. V. (2019, June). The analysis of trends and the assessment of the worldwide high-tech production development. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 272, No. 3, p. 032218). IOP Publishing. [DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/272/3/032218]
15. Ashtarian, K. (2015) Iran. In: UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030. S. Schneegans and D. Eröcal (eds). UNESCO Publishing: Paris. ISBN: 978-2-3-100129-1
16. Broughel, J., & Thierer, A. D. (2019). Technological innovation and economic growth: A brief report on the evidence. Mercatus Research Paper.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3347294 [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3346495]
17. Cozzens, S. E., Bobb, K., & Bortagaray, I. (2002). Evaluating the distributional consequences of science and technology policies and programs. Research Evaluation, 11(2), 101-107. [DOI:10.3152/147154402781776899]
18. Checchi, D., Malgarini, M., & Sarlo, S. (2019). Do performance‐based research funding systems affect research production and impact?. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(1), 45-69. [DOI:10.1111/hequ.12185]
19. Comments by Vice President for Science and Technology of Iran, during his visit to the United Nations in New York, September 25, 2014.
20. Center for Innovation and Technology Cooperation, A Summary of Selected Technological Achievements in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, 2012.
21. Diebolt, C., & Hippe, R. (2019). The long-run impact of human capital on innovation and economic development in the regions of Europe. Applied Economics, 51(5), 542-563. [DOI:10.1080/00036846.2018.1495820]
22. Epstein, J. (2006). The great engine that couldn't: Science, mistaken identifications, and the limits of cross-examination. Stetson L. Rev., 36, 727.
23. Ezrahi, Y. (1990). The descent of Icarus: Science and the transformation of contemporary democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Ezrahi, Y. (1990). The descent of Icarus: Science and the transformation of contemporary democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Reshetnyak, O. (2020). Modeling rating of scientific and technological development of the countries. Innovative technologies and scientific solutions for industries, (1 (11)), 80-89. [DOI:10.30837/2522-9818.2020.11.080]
26. Jones, C. I. (2016). The facts of economic growth. In Handbook of macroeconomics (Vol. 2, pp. 3-69). Elsevier. [DOI:10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.002]
27. Guzzini, S. (2017). Power and cause. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20, 737-759. [DOI:10.1057/s41268-016-0002-z]
28. Ghazinoori, Seyed Soroush, Alizadeh, Parisa, Ghazinoori, Seyes Masoud, AzadeganMehr, Mandana, Kheradmandnia, Soheila (2012). Providing an estimation of Iran R&D expenditures and its share out of GDP, Research report submitted to national research institute for science policy, Tehran, Iran.
29. Haas, P. M. (2015). Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315717906]
30. Haas, P. M. (2023). Preserving the epistemic authority of science in world politics. In Professions and proficiency (pp. 135-155). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-24910-5_7]
31. Heshmati, A., & Dibaji, S. M. (2019). Science, technology, and innovation status in Iran: main challenges. Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 545-578. [DOI:10.1177/0971721819873192]
32. Institute for Research & Planning in Higher Education (IRPHE) (2015). Report prepared by group of Statistical Researchand Information Technology on higher education statistics. Tehran.
33. Institute for Research & Planning in Higher Education (IRPHE) (2016). Statistics of Higher Education in Iran: A brief,2014−2015, Institute for Research & Planning in Higher Education, Tehran
34. Komkov, N. I. (2017). Scientific and technological development: Limitations and opportunities. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 28, 472-479. [DOI:10.1134/S1075700717050094]
35. Kyzym, M., Khaustova, V., Reshetnуak, O., Timohova, G., & Sakhnenko, O. (2019). Research Study of the Problems of Human Resourcing of the Scientific and Innovation Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3C), 213-218. [DOI:10.35940/ijrte.C1036.1183C19]
36. Korzhavykh, E. A. (2012). Scientometric assessment of the progress of innovative pharmacy in Russia. Russian Journal of General Chemistry, 82(3), 527-534. [DOI:10.1134/S1070363212030310]
37. Nikzad, M. (2012). Foreigners' point of view towards collaboration with Iranian authors. Webology, 9(2), 41-50.
38. National Report on Higher Education, Iran (2011-2012), Institute of Planning in Higher Education, Tehran, 2013, p. 2
39. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. U.S.-Iran Engagement in Science, Engineering, and Health (2010-2016): A Resilient Program but an Uncertain Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/24861 [DOI:10.17226/24861.]
40. Nichols, M. D., & Petzold, A. M. (2021). A crisis of authority in scientific discourse. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(2), 643-650. [DOI:10.1007/s11422-020-09989-1] [PMID] []
41. Paya, A., & Shoraka, H. R. B. (2010). Futures studies in Iran: Learning through trial and error. Futures, 42(5), 484-495. [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.033]
42. Rosenbloom, J. L., Ginther, D. K., Juhl, T., & Heppert, J. A. (2015). The effects of research & development funding on scientific productivity: Academic chemistry, 1990-2009. PloS one, 10(9), e0138176. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0138176] [PMID] []
43. Siyanbola, W., Adeyeye, A., Olaopa, O., & Hassan, O. (2016). Science, technology and innovation indicators in policy-making: the Nigerian experience. Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 1-9. [DOI:10.1057/palcomms.2016.15]
44. World Bank, W. D. I. (2019). World Development Indicators", Retrieved 2018, from The World Bank HYPERLINK, available at: http://ddp-ext.worldbank.org/
45. Stokes, D. E. (2011). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press.
46. Sarkar, S., & Beitollahi, A. (2009). An overview on nanotechnology activities in Iran. Iranian J Publ Health, 38(Suppl 1), 65-68.
47. Sarkissian, A. (2008). Intellectual property rights for developing countries: Lessons from Iran. Technovation, 28(11), 786-798. [DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.04.001]
48. Uzunidis, D., & Boutillier, S. (2012). Globalization of R&D and network innovation: what do we learn from the evolutionist theory?. Journal of Innovation Economics, (2), 23-52. [DOI:10.3917/jie.010.0023]
49. Wang, L., & Li, Z. (2018). Knowledge transfer from science to technology-The case of nano medical device technologies. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3, 11. [DOI:10.3389/frma.2018.00011]
50. Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?. Scientometrics, 62, 117-131. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7]
51. Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation. Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198819974.001.0001] [PMID] []
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)