Volume 25, Issue 77 (6-2025)
jgs 2025, 25(77): 128-151 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
fasihi H, heydari M. (2025). Comparative Study of Visual Aesthetics of Urban Space in Golestan and Moradab Neighborhoods of Karaj. jgs. 25(77), 128-151. doi:10.61186/jgs.25.77.15
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4189-en.html
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4189-en.html
Comparative Study of Visual Aesthetics of Urban Space in Golestan and Moradab Neighborhoods of Karaj
1- Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, University of Kharazmi Tehran, Iran. , fasihi@khu.ac.ir
2- Ph.D Student of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, University of Kharazmi Tehran, Iran,
2- Ph.D Student of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, University of Kharazmi Tehran, Iran,
Abstract: (5035 Views)
Beauty is among the most sublime human needs. Since the time humans began building cities, they have paid attention to the sense of aesthetics. The purpose of this research is to conduct a comparative evaluation of two neighborhoods, Golestan and Moradab, as the two most well-off and least well-off neighborhoods in Karaj city, in terms of the aesthetic indicators of urban space. The research method is descriptive-analytical and data collection on 14 selected components related to the aesthetics of the urban environment was carried out by direct observation and using an evaluation checklist. Descriptive statistics parameters were used to analyze and compare the aesthetic level of the two neighborhoods, and zoning maps were drawn in the geographic information system and calculations and analysis were performed on the relevant descriptive tables to analyze spatial inequalities. Considering the evaluation of the indicators in the range of 1-10 points and assigning a higher point to a higher level of aesthetics, the findings showed that the average figure of the total indicators in Golestan neighborhood is 6.31 and in Moradab neighborhood is 2.57. Also, in Golestan neighborhood, the median figure is 6.43 and the first quartile figure is 4, while in Moradab neighborhood these figures are 1.78 and 1, respectively. Spatial analysis of the zoning map showed that in Golestan neighborhood, in terms of total indicators, there are no areas that are at the "very low" and "low" levels in terms of aesthetics, while in Mardab neighborhood, there are no areas at the "high" and "medium-high" levels. It can be concluded that Golestan neighborhood is at a high level in terms of aesthetic indicators and there is a lot of spatial inequality within and between the two studied neighborhoods.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Geography and Urban Planning
References
1. امین‌زاده، بهناز، (1389)، ارزیابی زیبایی و هویت مکان، نشریۀ هویت شهر، (5)7: صص 3-14 .
2. https://www.sid.ir/paper/154726/fa
3. آیوازیان، سیمون،(1381)، زیبایی‌شناسی و خاستگاه آن در نقد معماری، هنرهای زیبا، (12)12: صص 64-69.
4. بل، سایمون.(1386). منظر، ادراک، الگو، فرآیند، (ترجمه: بهناز امین زاده) چاپ دوم تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
5. جلالیان، محمد،(1399)، طراحی خیابان های شهری به منظور خلق مکان های خاطره انگیز برای ایجاد حس تعلق به فضا در محلات، هفتمین کنفرانس ملی پژوهش های کاربردی در مهندسی عمران، معماری و مدیریت شهری و ششمین نمایشگاه تخصصی انبوه سازان مسکن و ساختمان استان تهران،تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/1037418
6. فهیمی‌فر، اصغر،(1388)، جستاری در زیبایی‌شناسی هنر اسلامی، پژوهش درفرهنگ و هنر، (2)6:صص13-18.
7. https://www.sid.ir/paper/146564/fa
8. گلکار،کوروش، (1387)، محیط بصری؛سیرتحول از رویکرد تزیینی تا رویکرد پایدار، فصلنامۀ علوم محیطی، (5)4: صص 95-114. https://envs.sbu.ac.ir/article_96898.html
9. لنگ، جان. (1381). آفرینش نظریـه معماری، (ترجمه: دکتر علیرضا عینی‌فر) جلد اول، چاپ اول، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
10. متقی، علی‌بن‌حسام. (1988). کنز العمال فی سنن الاقوال و الافعال، جلد اول، چاپ اول، انتشارات دارالکتب العلمیه، بیروت، لبنان.
11. متولی، مسعود، (1389)، بررسی و سنجش کیفیت زیبایی در منظر شهری بر اساس مفهوم دیدهای متوالی (نمونه موردی مسیر گردشگری دارآباد تهران)، فصلنامۀآرمانشهرسال، (3)5: صص123-139. https://www.sid.ir/paper/202543/fa
12. مرکز آمار ایران (1395) . شیپ فایل بلوک‌های جمعیتی سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن 1395مربوط به منطقه یک شهرداری کرج : www.amar.ir تاریخ دریافت: 25/12/1400
13. منصوری، امیر،(1384)، درآمدی بر زیبایی‌شناسی باغ ایرانی، ماهنامۀ باغ نظر، (2)3: صص 58-63.
14. http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_1504.html
15. واعظی، مهدی،(1395)، بررسی روش های ارزیابی و تحلیل کیفیت و زیبایی شناسی محیط و منظر شهری، فصلنامه انسان و محیط زیست،(6)45: صص95-114. https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_12774.html
16. Aivazian, S., (2002), Aesthetics and Its Origin in Architectural Criticism, Fine Arts, (12)12: pp. 64-69.https://jhz.ut.ac.ir/?_action=article&au=99725&_au=%D8%AF%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%B1+%D8%B3%DB%8C%D9%85%D9%88%D9%86++%D8%A2%DB%8C%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B2%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%86
17. Aminzadeh, B., (2010), Assessment of Beauty and Location Identity, Hoyt Shahr Publication, (5)7: pp. 3-14. https://www.sid.ir/paper/154726/fa
18. Andersen, H.S., (2008), Why do residents want to leave deprived neighborhoods? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23(2): 79-101. https://boligforskning.dk/. [DOI:10.1007/s10901-008-9109-x]
19. Appleyard, D.,(1965), Motion sequence and the City ,The nature and art of motion, University of Newyork, p 91. Motion, sequence and the city: Appleyard, Donald: Amazon.com: Books
20. Aschwanden, G.D.P.A & et al., (2011), Empiric design evaluation in urban planning, Automation in Construction, 20(6):299- 310. https://www.academia.edu/. [DOI:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.10.007]
21. Bai, X., & et al., (2012), Health and wellbeing in the changing urban environment: Complex challenges, scientific responses, and the way forward, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(9): 465- 472. Sci-Hub | Health and wellbeing in the changing urban environment: complex challenges, scientific responses, and the way forward. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(4), 465-472 | 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.009 [DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.009]
22. Bell, S., (2012), Landscape, Perception, Pattern, Process (Translation: Aminzadeh), Second Edition of Tehran, University of Tehran, p 1. [DOI:10.4324/9780203120088]
23. Bentley, I., (2011), Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers, (M. Behzadfar, Trans.), Iran University of Science and Technology Publications, p 6.
24. Carmona, M., (2012), Public places, urban spaces, University of Architectural, p16. [DOI:10.4324/9780080515427]
25. Cobs, J., (1961), Death and Life in Great American Cities. New York Random House Press.
26. Clarke, R., & et al., (1996), Designing out Crime, in Critical Justice Issues, University of American Society of Criminology. P 435. Designing Out Crime (From Critical Criminal Justice Issues: Task Force Reports From the American Society of Criminology, P 85-93, 1996, American Society of Criminology, ed.) | Office of Justice Programs (ojp.gov).
27. Cullen, G., (2013), The Concise Townscape, (M. Tabibian, Trans.), Publications of Tehran University, , Tehran, p 8. [DOI:10.4324/9780080502816]
28. Fahimifar, A., (2009), A Study of The Aesthetics of Islamic Art, Research in Culture and Art, (2)6:pp. 13-18. https://www.sid.ir/paper/146564/fa
29. Gehl, J., (2004), Public Spaces, Public Life, Copenhagen Danish Architectural, P 5.
30. Golkar, K., (2008), Visual Environment, Evolution from Decorative Approach to Sustainable Approach, Environmental Sciences Chapter, (5)4: pp. 95-114https://envs.sbu.ac.ir/article_96898.html
31. Hebert, A., (1957), Models of man, University of Newyork, p 657.
32. Holm, I.,(2006), Ideas and Beliefs in Architecture and industrial design: How attitudes, Orientations, and underlying assumptions shape the built environment, University of Chicago, p 98. Ideas and beliefs in architecture and industrial design : how attitudes, orientations, and underlying assumptions shape built environment | WorldCat.org (philpapers.org)
33. Isaacs, R., (2010), The urban picturesque: An aesthetic experience of urban pedestrian places, Journal of Urban Design, 5(2): 145-180. 28. [DOI:10.1080/713683961]
34. Jackson, L. E., (2003), The relationship of urban design to human health and condition, Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(8): 191- 200. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00230-X]
35. Jacobs, P., (2011), Where have all the Flowers Gone, Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(6): 318-320.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.021 [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.021.]
36. Jalalian, M., (2020), Designing urban streets to create memorable places to create a sense of belonging to space in neighborhoods, 7th National Conference on Applied Research in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Management and the 6th Specialized Exhibition of Mass Housing and Building Builders in Tehran Province, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/1037418
37. Lang, J., (2002), The Creation of Architect's Theories, (Translation: Dr. Alireza Einifar), University of Tehran, p 3.
38. Lynch, K., (2008), A theory of city form, ) Translation: H. Bahrainy,), Publications of Tehran University, Tehran, p 5.
39. Lynch, K,. (2009), Image of City, ) Translation: M. Mozayani), Publications of Tehran University, Tehran, p 8.
40. Lynch, K., (1960), The image of the city, Cambridge MIT, P5.
41. Mansouri, A., (2005), An Income on The Aesthetics of The Iranian Garden, Bagh-e Nazar Monthly, (2)3: pp. 58-63. http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_1504.html
42. Maron, D., & et al., (2008), Measuring sustainable development - Nation by nation, Ecological Economics, 64(5): 470 - 474
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.017 [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.017.]
43. Motovali, M., (2010), Study and Measurement of Beauty Quality in Urban Landscape Based on The Concept of Secomical Visions (Case Study of Darabad Tourism Route in Tehran), Armanshahr Sal Season, (3): 5: pp. 123-139. https://www.sid.ir/paper/202543/fa
44. Mottaghi, Ali ibn Hesam., (1988), Kanz al-'Amal in Sunn al-Aqwal and Al-Aqwal, Dar-ul-Katab al-Elmayeh Publications, Beirut, Lebanon, p 1.
45. Nasar, L .Jack., (1994) , The Evaluative Image of the City, Ohio State University, Sage Publication, p7.
46. Nelessen, A. C., (1994), Visions for a New American Dream, Chicago APA Planner P4.
47. Newman, L.,& et al., (2008), Sustainable urban community development from the grassroots: Challenges and opportunities in a pedestrian street initiative, Local Environment, 13(9): 129-139. [DOI:10.1080/13549830701581879.]
48. Nohl, W., (2001), Sustainable Landscape Use and Aesthetic Perception - Preliminary Reflections on Future Landscape Aesthetics, Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(5) 223-237. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00138-4.]
49. Pacione, M,. (2003), Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing - a social geographical perspective, Landscape and Urban Planning 65(6), 19-30 [DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00234-7.]
50. Porteous, J. Douglas., (1971), Design with people, The Quality of the Urban Environment and Behavior, 20(6), 218- 310. [DOI:10.1177/001391657100300204.]
51. Potter, J. J., & Cantarero, R., (2006), How does increasing population and diversity affect resident satisfaction? A small community case study, Environment and Behavior, 38(6): 605- 625. [DOI:10.1177/0013916505284797]
52. Quercia, M., & et al., (2014), The effect of tall facades complexity on the aesthetic quality of urban landscape(case study: Tehran- Iran), Applied mathematic in Engineering management and technology, 2(6):146-156. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effect.
53. Rorty, R.M., & Rorty,R., (1991), Objectivity, relativism and truth, philosophical paper, Cambridge University, p8. Richard Rorty, Philosophical Papers - PhilPapers. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139173643]
54. Sell, J. L., & Taylor, G., (1987), Toward a Theoretical framework for landscape perception, Enviromental perception and Behavior: An Inventory and prospect, University of Chicago, p 9.
55. Tibbalds, F., (2004), Making People Friendaly Town; Improving The Public nvironment in Towns and Cities, Harlow Longman, P1.
56. Topcu, K. D., & Topcu, M., (2012), Visual presentation of mental images in urban design education: Cognitive maps, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51(8), 573- 582. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.208]
57. Tu, K. J., & Lin, L. T., (2008), Evaluative structure of perceived residential environment quality in high-density and mixed-use urban settings: An exploratory study on Taipei City, Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(9), 157- 171. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.05.009]
58. Wang, M., & et al., (2016), Social and cultural factors that influence residential location choice of urban senior citizens in China: The case of Chengdu city, Habitat International, 53(7), 55-65. [DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.011]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)