تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

معناپذیری و حس تعلق به مکان در ارتقای سرمایه اجتماعی روستاییان

نویسندگان
مجید یاسوری 1
سمیرا محمودی 1
علیرضا دربان آستانه 2
فاطمه امامی 2
1 دانشگاه گیلان
2 دانشگاه تهران
10.61186/jgs.23.71.81
چکیده
سرمایه اجتماعی نقش مهمی در بالا بردن زیست‌پذیری دارد که بدون شک هدف مهم تمام برنامه‌ریزی-ها و توسعه، ازجمله برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه روستایی است. این تحقیق از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی است که با نمونه‌ای با حجم 355 نفر از میان افراد روستاهای کردنشین در شهرستان رودبار انجام شده است. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها در این پژوهش شامل: مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات مربوط به ادبیات تحقیق و سپس پژوهش‌های میدانی از طریق مشاهده و پرسشنامه بهره گرفته شد. جامعه آماری تحقیق، روستاهای کردنشین استان گیلان واقع در شهرستان رودبار با تعداد 12 روستا و مجموع 2955 نفر جمعیت (براساس سرشماری سال 1395) می‌باشد. تعداد نمونه‌ها با استفاده از جدول مورگان، 340 نفر تعیین شد که به منظور افزایش سطح اطمینان و کاهش خطا در داده‌ها، تعداد نمونه‌ها افزایش یافته و 355 پرسشنامه تکمیل گردید. پژوهش به منظور تبیین سیستماتیک عوامل تأثیرگذار بر تعلق مکانی و نیل به یک مدل جامع از تکنیک چند متغیری تحلیل مسیر استفاده شد و تأثیرات مستقیم و غیرمستقیم متغیرهای مورد بحث، در یک مدل مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج تحقیق حاکی از آن است که متغیرهای کالبدی تعلق مکانی(456/0)، بعد اعتماد سرمایه اجتماعی(216/0)، بعد محیطی تعلق مکانی(168/0)، بعد عملکردی تعلق مکانی(129/0)، بعد همبستگی اجتماعی و بعد مشارکت سرمایه اجتماعی به ترتیب مهم‌ترین عواملی هستند که به صورت مستقیم بر نمایه تعلق مکانی روستاییان موثر هستند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سرمایه اجتماعی
توسعه روستایی
تعلق مکانی
همبستگی اجتماعی
مشارکت اجتماعی

عنوان مقاله English

Sensibility and sense of belonging to the place in promoting the social capital of the villagers (Case study: Kurdish villages, Rudbar city)

نویسندگان English

Majid Yasouri 1
Samira Mahmoudi 1
Ali Reza Darban Astaneh 2
Fatemeh Emami 2
1 University of guilan
2 University of Tehran
چکیده English

Social capital plays an important role in increasing bioavailability, which undoubtedly is the main goal of all planning and development, including rural planning and development. This research is an applied and descriptive-analytical approach that is conducted with a sample of 355 people among the people of Kurdish villages in Rudbar city. The data gathering tool in this research included: library studies for gathering information about research literature and then field research through observation and questionnaire. The statistical population of the study is Kurdish villages of Guilan province in Rudbar with 12 villages and 2955 population (according to the census of 1395). The number of samples was determined using the Morgan table, 340 people were selected. To increase the level of confidence and reduce the error in the data, the number of samples was increased and 355 questionnaires were completed The research was used to systematically explain the factors influencing location and achieve a comprehensive model of multivariate path analysis. The direct and indirect effects of the variables discussed were studied in a model. The results of the research indicate that the physical variables of spatial belonging (0.445), the dimension of social capital trust (0.126), the environmental dimension of spatial attachment (0.168), spatial sense of belonging dimension (0.99), social correlation dimension And then social capital participation is the most important factors that directly affect the location of the villagers' affiliation.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Social capital
rural development
spatial belonging
Social Solidarity
Social participation
21- Abdul-Hakim, R., Bdul-Razak, N.A. & Ismail, R. (2010), Does social capital reduce poverty? A case study of rural households in Terengganu, Malaysia, European journal of social sciences, Vol. 14, No. 4, PP. 556-566.
22- Anchorena, J. & Anjos, F. (2008), Social Ties and Economic Development, working paper. Available on: http:// ssrn. Com.
23- Austin, D. M., Furr, L. A., & Spine, M. (2002). The effects of neighborhood conditions on perceptions of safety. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(5), 417–427.
24- Bonaiuto, M. Fornara, F. & Bonnes, M. (2002), Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city of Rome, Landscape and Urban Planning, 988, 1-12.
25- Bott, S.E., Banning, J.,Wells, M., Haas, G & Lakey, J. (2006), A sense of place: A framework and its application, College Services, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp 42-47.
26- Bourdieu, Pierre. (1983). “The Forms of Capital”, In: John G. Richardson (ed). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press. P. 241-258.
27- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 723–742.
28- Brown, B. B., & Perkins, D. D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment, (Vol. 12, pp. 279–304). New York: Plenum.
29- Brown, B. B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. (2004). Incivilities, place attachment and crime: Block and individual effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 359–371.
30- Coleman, James. (1988). “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement): P. 95-120.
31- Cuba, L., & Hummon, D. M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community, and region. Sociological Quarterly, 34(1), 111–131.
32- Dallago, L., Perkins, D. D., Santinello, M., Boyce, W., Molcho, M., & Morgan, A. (2009). Adolescent Place Attachment, Social Capital, and Perceived Safety: A Comparison of 13 Countries. Am J Community Psychol, 44: 148 –160.
33- Fukuyama, Francis. (1999). The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. The Free Press. New York.
34- Greider, T., & Garkovich, L. (1994). Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology, 59, 1–24.
35- Huang J., Brink M.V.D., Groot W. (2009), A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Education on Social Capital, Economics of education review, No. 28, PP. 464-454.
36- Jessor, R. M. (1993). Successful adolescent development among youth in high-risk settings. American Psychologist, 48, 117–126.
37- Kawachi I, (1999). “Social capital and community effects on population and individual health”. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 896; PP: 120-130.
38- LaGrange, R. L., Ferraro, K. F., & Supancic, M. (1992). Perceived risk and fear of crime: Role of social and physical incivilities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 311–334.
39- Lewicka, M. (2005). Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 381–395.
40- Lewicka, M. (2005). Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 381–395.
41- Long, D. A., & Perkins, D. D. (2007). Community social and place predictors of sense of community: A multilevel and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(5), 563–581.
42- Mahmoudi, S, Yasouri, M, Emami, S.F. (2018). A Spatial- Location Analysis of the Factors Affecting Place Attachment (Case Study: Kurdish Villages, Rahmatabad and Blokat Districts, Rudbar County), Journal of Research and Rural Planning Volume 7 , No. 3, Autumn 2018, Serial No.23.
43- Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), 335–350.
44- Mohan, G & Mohan, J. (2002), Placing social capital, Progress in Human Geography, 26, pp: 191-211, DOI: 10.1191/0309132502ph364ra.
45- Payton, Michelle Angela Payton (2003), Influence of Place Attachment and Social Capital on Civic Action: A Study at Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge, master’s thesis of Natural Resources Science and Management Program, University of Minnesota.
46- Perkins, D. D., & Long, D. A. (2002). Neighborhood sense of community and social capital: A multi-level analysis. In A. T. Fisher, C. C. Sonn, & B. J. Bishop (Eds.), Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications (pp. 291– 318). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
47- Pol, E. (2002). The theoretical background of the city-identity sustainability network. Environment and Behavior, 34, 8–25.
48- Punter, J. (1991), Participation in the design of urban space, Landscape Design, No 200, 24-27.
49- Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
50- Putnam, Robert. 1993. The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. American Prospect. P. 35-42.
51- Raudenbush, S. W. (2003). The quantitative assessment of neighborhood social environments. In I. Kawachi & L. F. Berkman (Eds.), Neighborhoods and health (pp. 112–131). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52- Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
53- Salvesen, D. (2002), The Making of Place, Research on Place & Space Website, 20 Feb. 2003; 12 Mar 2003, .
54- Sanders, S., Bowie, S. L., & Bowie, Y. D. (2003). Lessons learned on forced relocation of older adults: the impact of hurricane Andrew on health, mental health, and social support of public housing residents. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 40, 23–35.
55- Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1–10.
56- Semken, S & Freeman, C. B. (2008). Sense of Place in the Practice and Assessment of Place-Based Science Teaching, Science Education 92, pp: 1042-1058. DOI 10.1002/sce.20279.
57- Sennett, R. (2000). New capitalism, new isolation: A flexible city of strangers. Le Monde Diplomatique. (English Edition).
58- Shamai, S. (1991), Sense of place: an empirical measurement, Israel, geoforum, Vol.22, pp: 347-358.
59- Skogan, W. G. (1990). Disorder and decline. New York: Free Press.
60- Soini, K. Vaarala, H., and Pouta, E. (2012). Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface. Landscape and Urban Planning; 104, 124– 134.
61- Steele, F. (1981), The Sense of Place, Boston: CBI Publishing Company.
62- Stefanovic, I. L. (1998), Phenomenological Encounters with Place: Cavtat to Square One, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 31-44.
63- Uzzell, D., Pol, E., & Badenas, D. (2002). Place identification, social cohesion, and environmental sustainability. Environment and Behavior, 34, 26–53.
64- Vorkinn, M., & Riese, H. (2001). Environmental concern in a local context. The significance of place attachment. Environment and Behavior, 33, 249–263.
65- Warner, F. (1999), Social capital construction and the role of the local state, rural sociology pp. 120-159.
66- Xu, Y. (1995), "Sense of Place and Identity", Research on Place & Space Website; 20 Feb. 2003; 12 Mar. 2003; .