تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

سنجش وضعیت کلانشهر تهران بر مبنای شاخص های شهر فراگیر

نویسندگان
هانیه اسدزاده 1
افشار حاتمی 1
فرزانه ساسان پور 2
1 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه خوارزمی
2 دانشیار جغرافیای و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
10.52547/jgs.22.67.301
چکیده
مطابق با پارادایم جدید شهری، استفاده از سیستم های نوآورانه از جمله ایجاد شهر های فراگیر با سیستم های همگرای هوشمند، راه حلی برای غلبه بر این مشکلات شهری است. شهرفراگیر از شهرهای آینده ای است که در آن فضاهای فیزیکی و فضاهای الکترونیکی همگرا می شوند. به لحاظ ساختاری، شهر فراگیر متشکل از مکان، فضا، فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات و انسان است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی و به لحاظ ماهیت و روش تحقیق، توصیفی-تحلیلی است. از بررسی مبانی نظری 15 بعد و 77 شاخص تعیین و داده های مورد نیاز پژوهش از طریق سالنامه آماری و گزارش های منتشره سازمان فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات گردآوری شدند. امتیازدهی داده ها به صورت وجود کامل شاخص (1)، وجود نیمه و ناقص شاخص (0.5) و نبود شاخص (صفر) در نظر گرفته شد و در نرم افزار اکسل تحلیل شدند. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که وضعیت کلانشهر تهران از نظر پراکنش شاخص های شهر فراگیر بسیار نامناسب است. ابعاد بهداشت و درمان، حکمروایی، فرهنگ و گردشگری، آموزش، مسکن، حمل و نقل، زیرساختار، شهروندان، تجارت، سیستم مالی به ترتیب بیشترین کمبودها(زیر 50 درصد) را دارند. ابعاد خدمات، محیط زیست، شبکه انرژی و شبکه آب به ترتیب تنها بخش هایی هستند که وضعیت شاخص ها (بالای 50 درصد) در آن ها به مراتب بهتر است. بطور کلی طبقه بندی ابعاد نشان داد که 13.33 درصد ابعاد در وضعیت خیلی خوب، 13.33 درصد در وضعیت خوب، 20 درصد در وضعیت متوسط، 40 درصد در وضعیت ضعیف و 13.33 درصد در وضعیت بسیار ضعیف قرار دارند. موجودیت شاخص ها نیز نشان داد که 33.76 درصد شاخص بطور کلی وجود ندارند. 42.85 درصد از شاخص ها به صورت ناقص و تنها 23.37 درصد از شاخص ها به صورت کامل وجود دارند. در نهایت اولویت بندی توسعه شاخص ها برای ایجاد شهر فراگیر در کلانشهر تهران ارایه شد. نتایج این تحقیق می تواند در زمینه اولویت های توسعه شهر فراگیر در کلانشهر تهران به کار رود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
شهر فراگیر
فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات
شهرهای آینده
پایداری
کلانشهر تهران

عنوان مقاله English

Measuring the condition of Tehran Metropolitan based on Ubiquitous city indicators

نویسندگان English

Haniyeh Asadzadeh 1
Afshar Hatami 1
Farzaneh Sasanpour 2
1 Ph.d candidate kharazmi university
2 Associate Professor, kharazmi university
چکیده English

According to a new urban paradigm using new innovative systems like crating ubiquitous city with smart convergent systems is a way to solve urban problems. The ubiquitous city is a future city in which physical spaces and electronic spaces are convergent. In terms of structural view ubiquitous city consists of space, ICT, and human. This research method is applied and descriptive analytic one. By reviewing the literature on 15 aspects and 77 indices are gathered and selected. Required data for research gathered through field study. Research result indicates that the distribution of indicators of Ubiquitous city in Tehran metropolitan is very inappropriate. The most significant shortage (More than 50 %) in Tehran metropolitan are in U-Health and care U-Governance, U-culture, and sports, U-education, U-housing, U-transportation, infrastructure, citizens, trade and finance aspects. In turn, U-facilities, U-environment, U-energy network, and U-water network are the only aspects that the distribution of indicators (More than 50 %) are appropriate. In general, dimensional classification showed that 13.33 percent of the dimensions were in an excellent condition, 13.33 percent in good condition, 20 percent in moderate condition, 40 percent in poor condition and 13.33 percent in deplorable condition. The existence of indicators also showed that 33.76 percent of the index is not available at all85% of the indicators are incomplete, and only 23.37% of the indicators are fully exhaustive — finally, the priority of indicators propose to the development of U-city in Tehran metropolis. the results of this research applicable for furthor transformation of Tehran to ubiquitous city.



#s3gt_translate_tooltip_mini { display: none !important; }

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Ubiquitous city
ICT
Future City
Sustainability
Tehran
Anthopoulos, L., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). From digital to ubiquitous cities: Defining a common architecture for urban development. Proceedings - 2010 6th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, IE 2010, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1109/IE.2010.61
Anttiroiko, A. V. (2013). U-cities reshaping our future: Reflections on ubiquitous infrastructure as an enabler of smart urban development. AI and Society, 28(4), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0443-5
Asprone, D., Prota, A., & Manfredi, G. (2014). Linking Sustainability and Resilience of Future Cities. In Resilience and Sustainability in Relation to Natural Disasters: A Challenge for Future Cities (pp. 55–65). Springer.
Bellagamba, U. (2016). From Ideal to Future Cities: Science Fiction as an Extension of Utopia. Philosophy & Technology, 29(1), 79–96.
de Ruyter, B., & Aarts, E. (2004). Ambient intelligence: visualizing the future. Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces - AVI ’04, 203. https://doi.org/10.1145/989863.989897
Jung Hoon Han Sang Ho Lee (2013). Planning ubiquitous cities for social inclusion Development, U.*, 4(2.
Economy, I. T., Park, W., Jeong, W., & Cho, H. (2007). A Study of the Evolution of the u-City Service, 5–9.
Gasparini, P., Di Ruocco, A., & Russo, R. (2014). Natural hazards impacting on future cities. In Resilience and Sustainability in Relation to Natural Disasters: A Challenge for Future Cities (pp. 67–76). Springer.
Ghaemi Rad, T., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Abbasi, A., & Choi, S. M. (2018). A methodological framework for assessment of ubiquitous cities using ANP and DEMATEL methods. Sustainable Cities and Society, 37(November 2017), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.024
Jang, M., & Suh, S. T. (2010). U-city: New trends of urban planning in Korea based on pervasive and ubiquitous geotechnology and geoinformation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in
Bioinformatics), 6016 LNCS (PART 1), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12156-2-20
Kim, T. J. (2008). Planning for knowledge cities in ubiquitous technology spaces: opportunities and challenges. In Creative Urban Regions: Harnessing Urban Technologies to Support Knowledge City Initiatives (pp. 218–230). IGI Global.
Kim, Y. M., Kim, H. S., Moon, S. Y., & Bae, S. (2012). Ubiquitous Eco-City Planning in Korea. A Project for the Realization of Ecological City Planning and Ubiquitous Network Society, 6(April 2009), 22–25.
Lee, S. H., Han, J. H., Leem, Y. T., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2008a). Towards ubiquitous city: concept, planning, and experiences in the Republic of Korea. In Knowledge-based urban development: Planning and applications in the information era (pp. 148–170). IGI Global.
Lee, S. H., Han, J. H., Leem, Y. T., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2008b). Towards ubiquitous city. Knowledge-Based Urban Development, (January), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-720-1.ch009
Lee, Y. W. L. Y. W., & Rho, S. R. S. (2010). U-city portal for smart ubiquitous middleware. Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), 2010 The 12th International Conference On, 1, 609–613.
Leem, C. S., & Kim, B. G. (2013). Taxonomy of ubiquitous computing service for city development. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(7), 1475–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0583-5
Liu, J., Wang, J., Tao, X., & Shen, J. (2017). Secure similarity-based cloud data deduplication in Ubiquitous city. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 41, 231–242.
Oh, J., & Oh, S. (2011). Some aspects of the ubiquitous services on the u-City implementation. In Mobile IT Convergence (ICMIC), 2011 International Conference on (pp. 78–81). IEEE.
Park, J. W., Yun, C. H., Rho, S. W., Lee, Y. W., & Jung, H. S. (2011). Mobile cloud web-service for U-City. In Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing (DASC), 2011 IEEE Ninth International Conference on (pp. 1061–1065). IEEE.
Park, S., Yi, M., Min, K., & Shin, D. (2016). Developing evaluation criteria by weighted importance in selecting U-City service types. Spatial Information Research, 24(4), 377–387.
Rho, S. W., Yun, C. H., & Lee, Y. W. (2011). Provision of U-city web services using cloud computing. In Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), 2011 13th International Conference on (pp. 1545–1549). IEEE.
Riffat, S., Powell, R., & Aydin, D. (2016). Future cities and environmental sustainability. Future Cities and Environment, 2(1), 1.
Rotondo, F. (2012). The U-city paradigm: Opportunities and risks for E-democracy in collaborative planning. Future Internet, 4(2), 563–574.
Shin, D. H. (2009). Ubiquitous city: Urban technologies, urban infrastructure and urban informatics. Journal of Information Science, 35(5), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551509100832
Shin, D., Nah, Y., Lee, I.-S., Wan, S. Y., & Won, Y.-J. (2008). Security Protective Measures for the Ubiquitous City Integrated Operation Center. In Broadband Communications, Information Technology & Biomedical Applications, 2008 Third International Conference on (pp. 239–244). IEEE.
Snieška, V., & Zykiene, I. (2014). The Role of Infrastructure in the Future City: Theoretical Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.183
Stock, W. G. (2015). Informational Urbanism. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 13(6), 62–69.
Thompson, E. M. (2016). What makes a city ‘smart’? International Journal of Architectural Computing, 14(4), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077116670744
Wang, J., Hui, L. C. K., Yiu, S. M., Wang, E. K., & Fang, J. (2017). A survey on cyber attacks against nonlinear state estimation in power systems of ubiquitous cities. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 39, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.04.005
Wang, R., Zhou, T., Hu, D., Li, F., & Liu, J. (2011). Cultivating eco-sustainability: Social-economic-natural complex ecosystem case studies in China. Ecological Complexity, 8(4), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.03.003
Yeh, H. (2017). The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens’ perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.001
Yigitcanlar, T. (2009). Managing Ubiquitous Eco Cities: the Role of Urban Telecommunication Infrastructure Networks and Convergence Technologies. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Future City: U-City Space for Future Life, (July(.
Yigitcanlar, T., & Lee, S. H. (2014). Korean ubiquitous-eco-city: A smart-sustainable urban form or a branding hoax? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.034
Ylipulli, J. (2015). A smart and ubiquitous urban future? Contrasting large-scale agendas and street-level dreams. Observatorio (OBS*), 9(ESPECIAL), 85–110.
Yoo, S. J., Min, K. J., Jeong, S. H., & Shin, D. Bin. (2016). Inter-ministerial collaboration to utilize CCTV video service operated by U-City center of South Korea. Spatial Information Research, 24(4), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-016-0040-z