Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

On the analysis of the strategic role of intermediate development in the recreation of urban decadent (worn out) districts (fabrics) (case study: metropolis of Tabriz, district 8)

Authors
gholamreza jaliz
Karim hoseinzadeh
hosein nazmfar
10.52547/jgs.22.67.113
Abstract
An infill development of the process of urban developing and reusing empty or unused parts or sections of existing urban areas that have already been developed. the infill development, which may be considered as the simplest interpretation of endogenous development, tends to extend development on these lands, with emphasizing the abandoned and empty intra-city lands. Current research with an analytical approach in the infill development with the emphasis on the 8th district of Tabriz Municipality and utilizing statistical-spatial methods has been get involved to this issue. This kind of research is known as descriptive-analytical. the methodology of this research is based on quantitative-spatial approaches. the research method used in this study is a combination of documentary-library methods. in the analytical section, considering the indicators and requirements of infill development in the form of 16 target indicators, the case study and feasibility of infill development in Tabriz 8th district have been discussed. in the current study, to investigate and analyze the strategic role of infill development in regeneration of the urban texture worn of the historical-cultural axis of the metropolitan city of Tabriz, utilizing the geographical information system (GIS) software and Overlapping Functional Analysis, type of weighted overlay and FAHP is done. The results of present study are presented in the form of three priority development plans as well as unauthorized developmental areas.
Keywords
intermediate development
recreation
decadent (worn out) districts (fabrics)
Tabriz municipality
district 8
13. Adams, D., Sousa, C. de, & Tiesdell, S. (2009). Brownfield Development: A Comparison of North American and British Approaches. Urban Studies, 47 (1), 75–104.
14. Annette Steinacker(2003), Infill Development And Affordable Housing, Patterns from
1996 to 2000, Urban Affairs Review, First Published March 1.
15. Bellu, Lorenzo G(2011), Development and Development Paradigms(A Reasoned) Review of Prevailing Visions, copyright@fao.org, PP:1- 46.
16. Breheny, M.J., (2006), Sustainable Development and Urban Form, Pion, London;
17. Caves, R. W. (2005). Encyclopedia of the city. Abingdon, Oxon, OX, New York, NY: Routledge
18. Christensen, A.J. (2005). Dictionary of landscape architecture and construction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Cowan, R. (2005). The dictionary of urbanism. Tisbury, Wiltshire: Streetwise Press.
20. E. Sendich, (2006), Planning and Urban Design Standards, American Planning Association, John Willey & Sons;
21. Hutchison, R. (2010). Encyclopedia of urban studies. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.
22. J. Terrence Farris(2010), The barriers to using urban infill development to achieve smart growth, Journal Housing Policy Debate, Volume 12, 2001 - Issue 1.
23. Kyttä, M., Kahila, M., & Broberg, A. (2010). Perceived environmental quality as an input to urban infill policy-making. Urban Des Int., 16 (1), 19–35.
24. Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington (MRSC) (1997), Infill Development Strategies for Shaping Livable Neighborhoods.
25. Peter Newton& Stephen Glackin(2014), Understanding Infill: Towards New Policy and Practice for Urban Regeneration in the Established Suburbs of Australia's Cities, Journal Urban Policy and Research, Volume 32, 2014 - Issue 2.
26. Sant’Ana, Matthias(2008), The Evolution of the Concept of Development: From Economic Growth to Human Development, Working Paper, Inter-University Attraction Pole VI/06, pp: 1- 35.
27. Strategies for successful infill development (2001). Washington, D.C: Northeast-Midwest Insitute, Congress for the New Urbanism.
28. Virginia McConnell , Keith Wiley(2010), Infill Development: Perspectives and Evidence from Economics and Planning, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC 20036
29. Walters, David& Brown,Linda (2004) Design First: Design based planning for communities, Architectural Press.
30. Watson, D., Plattus, A. J., & Shibley, R. G. (2003). Time-saver standards for urban design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. (EPA), United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2004, Making way for urban in fill and brown field Redevelopment, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.
32. www.tabriz.ir.