Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Modeling and assessment of new urbanist principles in center neighborhoods in Kashan

Authors
1 professor, university of kashan
2 Assistant Professor, university of kashan
3 ma studant, university of kashan
Abstract
The most important problem of the worn- ut context in urban is that these textures can not meet the needs of contemporary life. This can be of tissue due to the specific characteristics of a rare opportunity to play an effective role in sustainable development, one of the main strategies in this area can be a new urbanism approach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the principles of new urbanism is in the neighborhood of the central city of Kashan. The research method is analytical and is the main tool for data collection was a questionnaire. The sample size of 382 was calculated by the formula. To analyze the results of the questionnaire T-test through SPSS software is used for modeling equations using Amos software. The results suggest that indicators of modernity in the city of Kashan in central areas is not desirable, but a significant difference in terms of modern urban indicators in both new and old tissue there. The principles of modernism in town, the stand by weight of the total facade nodal regression 0.98 has most effective and the index of participation due to lack of poll officials on matters related to the principles of new urbanism is a minimal role in the neighborhood.
Keywords

Bertolini,L., (2010). Sustainable urban mobility, an evolutionary approach, European Spatial, Research Policy 1, 109–126.
Charles C.Tu and Mark. J. Eppli, (1999), Valuing New Urbanism: The Case of Kentland, Real Estate Economics. 27)3(, 425-451.
Charles C.Tu and mark.J. Eppli., (1999). Valuing New Urbanism: The Case of Kentland, Real Estate Economics. 27(3), 425-451.
Charles, B. (2000). New Urbanism and the City: Potential Application and Implications for Distressed Inner-City, Neighborhoods, Housing Policy Debate. 11(4), 760-800.
CNU & HUD., (2000). Principles for inner city neighborhood design, Conferences of Health Risk. Blonya, Italy, 356-370
Edward, J, Jepson, Jr, Mary, M, Edwards., (2010). How possible is Sustainable Development? An Anal- ysis of Planners, Percptions New Urbanism, Smart Growth and the Ecological City, Planning Practice & Research,25,4.
Hall, P., (1995). Towards a General Urban Theory, New York University site,Longman Australia publishers, 31 p.
Hikichi, Lynda.,(2003). New Urbanism and Transportion, university of Wisconsin- Milwaukee.
Lehrer,Jim(2004),What is newUrbanism/ www.newurbanism.org
Leonard, Hill (2010). "Changing Places: The Advantages of Multi-sited Ethnography". In Hyderabad, Mark-Anthony. Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research. Ashgate Publishing. pp. 165–180. ISBN 0-7546-7318-9.
Marshall,Stephan,2003,New Urbanism:An Introduction , Built Environment, Vol.29,3