تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

تحرک و جابجایی هوشمند و پایداری اجتماعی: ارزیابی روابط متقابل (مطالعه موردی: شهر شیراز)

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری دانشگاه اصفهان
2 دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری دانشگاه اصفهان
چکیده
کشور ما ایران با تغییرات جهانی شهرها فاصله زیادی ندارد. یکی از این تغییرات ، تحرک هوشمند است که امروزه در مدیریت شهری غیرقابل انکار و اجتناب ناپذیر است. به ویژه در کلانشهرها که با افزایش جمعیت و مشکلات اقتصادی ، اجتماعی و زیست محیطی مختلف روبرو هستند. در حقیقت کلانشهرها همیشه مشکلات زیادی دارند ، از همه مهمتر حمل و نقل. شیراز به عنوان یکی از شهرهای بزرگ و یکی از شهرهای مهم کشور از جایگاه ویژه ای برخوردار است. این موقعیت از جنبه های مختلف فرهنگی ، تاریخی ، سیاسی و جنبه های مختلفی برخوردار است. نرخ رشد جمعیت آن نیز به دلیل موقعیت مکانی آن به طور پیوسته در حال افزایش است. این روند رشد جمعیت طی چند دهه گذشته ، مشکلات و موانعی را برای مدیریت پایدار و مطلوب ایجاد کرده است که مهمترین آنها مشکلاتی در بخش حمل و نقل است. همین روند نیاز به تأکید بر سیستم های هوشمند در این شهر را نشان می دهد. بنابراین ، در این مطالعه سعی شده است تحرک و جابجایی هوشمند و پایداری اجتماعی برای شیراز مورد بررسی و تحلیل قرار گیرد. روش تحقیق توصیفی- تحلیلی و مبتنی بر مطالعات اسنادی و اصالت است. نتایج نشان می دهد متغیرهای تحرک و جابجایی بر اساس ابعاد مختلف دسترسی ، حمل و نقل پایدار و همچنین فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در شرایط نامساعدی قرار دارند. شاخص های مختلف هر یک از این ابعاد به همین موضوع اشاره دارند ، زیرا سطح ارزیابی آن (سطح معنی داری کمتر از 0.05 و میانگین پایین تر از معیار) به عدم تمایل آنها از دیدگاه شهروندان اشاره دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Smart Urban Mobility and Social Sustainability: Exploring the relationship(Case Study:Shiraz City)

نویسندگان English

elahe kavoosi 1
Jamal Mohammadi 2
1 phd student of Geography and Urban Planning,
2 Associated Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning,isfahan University, isfahan, Iran
چکیده English

Our country Iran is not far from the global changes of cities. One of these changes is the smart mobility that is Undeniable and inevitablein urban management today. Especially in metropolises, which are facing increasing population and various economic, social and environmental problems. In fact, metropolises always have many problems, most importantly transportation. Shiraz, as one of the major cities and one of the major cities of the country, has a special place. This position is of different cultural, historical, political and other aspects. Its population growth rate has also been steadily increasing due to its location. This trend of population growth over the past few decades has created problems and obstacles for sustainable and desirable management, most notably problems in the transportation sector. The same trend illustrates the need to emphasize smart systems in this city. Therefore, in this study, it is attempted to investigate and analyze Smart Urban Mobility and Social Sustainability for Shiraz. The research method is descriptive-analytical and based on documentary and origin studies. The results show that the mobility and displacement variables are in poor condition based on different dimensions of access, sustainable transport as well as ICT. Different indices of each of these dimensions point to the same issue, as its level of evaluation (significance level less than 0.05 and average lower than the criterion) points to their undesirability from the point of view citizens. The study of the impact of smart mobility indicators on Social Sustainability also shows that smart mobility indicators account for 23% of the total variance of Social Sustainability. On this basis, it should be noted that the mobility variable does not have an appropriate position in Shiraz, and this has not only affected its development process in recent decades, but also poses many challenges for its future development. The growing trend of the population and on the other hand the various social and cultural features as well as tourism are evolving in such a way that it requires a major focus on a systematic transportation based on smart city approach.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Smart City
Smart Urban Mobility
Social sustainability
sustainable development
Shiraz city
Ahvenniemi, Hannele. Huovila. Aapo. Pinto-Seppä.Isabel., Airaksinen.Miimu, (2017), What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?,Cities, 60, 234–245.
Aleta.Neus Baucells,Alonso.Concepción Moreno ,M. Arce Ruiz.Rosa,(2017),Smart Mobility and Smart Environment in the Spanish cities,Transportation Research Procedia, 24, 163-170.
Battarra.Rosaria,Gargiulo.Carmela,Tremiterra.Maria Rosa,Zucaro.Floriana,(2018),Smart mobility in Italian metropolitan cities: A comparative analysis through indicators and actions,Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 556-567.
Benevolo. Clara, Dameri. Renata Paola, D’Auria. Beatrice .(2016), Smart Mobility in Smart City,Action Taxonomy, ICT Intensity and Public Benefits, Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series ,11,13-28.
Brčić .Davor, Marko Slavulj.Marko, Šojat.Dino, Jurak. Julijan ,(2018), The Role of Smart mobility in Smart Cities, 5‌th International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure,Zadar, Croatia, Publisher: University of Zagreb, ISSN: 1848-9850.
Caragliu.Andrea , F. Del Bo.Chiara,(2019),Smart innovative cities: The impact of Smart City policies on urban innovation,Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 373-383..
Cledou. Guillermina, Estevez. Elsa, Barbosa.Luis Soares ,(2018), A taxonomy for planning and designing smart mobility services,Government Information Quarterly, 35, 1, 61-76.
Dameri. Renata Paola, Benevolo.Clara, Veglianti.Eleonora , Li .Yaya,(2019),Understanding smart cities as a glocal strategy: A comparison between Italy and China,Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 26-41.
Desdemoustiera.Jonathan, Crutzena.Nathalie, Coolsb.Mario, Tellerb.Jacques, (2019), Smart City appropriation by local actors: An instrument in the making,Cities ,92 , 175–186.
Garau.Chiara, Masala.Francesca,Pinna. Francesco, (2016), Cagliari and smart urban mobility: Analysis and comparison,Cities, 56,35-46 .
Groth,Soren,(2019),Multimodal divide: Reproduction of transport poverty in smart mobility trends,Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Volume 125, 56-71.
Jeekel.Hans,(2017),Social Sustainability and Smart Mobility : Exploring the relationship,Transportation Research Procedia,25, 4296-4310.
Lyons.Glenn,(2018),Getting smart about urban mobility – Aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable,Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115, 4-14.
Orlowski Aleksander, Romanowska Patrycja, (2019) Smart Cities Concept: Smart Mobility Indicator, 50, 2.
Penaska. Michal, Veľas .Andrej, (2019), Possibilities of tracking city indicators in the sense of the Smart city concept,Transportation Research Procedia,40, 1525-1532.
Peprah.Charles, Amponsah.Owusu, Oduro.Charles, (2019), A system view of smart mobility and its implications for Ghanaian cities,Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 739-747.
Trindade ,Evelin Priscila, Farias Hinnig,Marcus Phoebe, da Costa.Eduardo Moreira, Sabatini Marques.Jamile, Cid Bastos.Rogério, Yigitcanla. Tan (2017) ، Sustainable development of smart cities: a systematic review of the literature, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market,and Complexity, 3.
United Nations. (2018), Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects; the 2018 Revision; United Nations: Key Facts.
Yadav.Gunjan, Mangla. Sachin Kumar, Luthra.Sunil, P. Rai.Dhiriaj, (2019), developing a sustainable smart city framework for developing economies: An Indian context, Sustainable Cities and Society, 47.
Yigitcanlar. Tan, Kamruzzaman. Md, (2018), does smart city policy lead to sustainability of cities, Land Use Policy, 73, 49–58.
Zawieska.Jakub, Pieriegud.Jana, (2018), Smart city as a tool for sustainable mobility and transport decarbonisation, Transport Policy, 63, 39 -50.