تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

عوامل بهبود معیشت پایدار روستایی از دیدگاه ساکنان محلی، مطالعه موردی: شهرستان اردبیل

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی روستایی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
2 استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی روستایی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
چکیده
هدف و ایده اصلی معیشت پایدار استفاده از منابع، دارایی‌ها و سرمایه‌های موجود (انسانی، اجتماعی، مالی، طبیعی، نهادی و فیزیکی) در مناطق روستایی بدون آسیب‌رسانی به محیط می‌باشد. بر این اساس، دارایی‌ها و سرمایه‌های روستایی می‌تواند پایه‌گذار دست‌یابی به اهداف معیشت پایدار روستایی باشد. هدف این مقاله عوامل بهبود معیشت پایدار روستایی از دیدگاه روستاییان استان اردبیل می‌باشد. این تحقیق، از لحاظ هدف توسعه‌ای، و از لحاظ ماهیت توصیفی و پیمایشی و نیز از نوع تحلیلی است. در این تحقیق روش گرد‌آوری داده‌ها برای پاسخ‌گویی به سئوالات تحقیق، به دو صورت اسنادی (داده‌های ثانویه) و پیمایشی (داده‌های اولیه) و ابزار مورد استفاده در روش پیمایشی پرسش‌نامه و مصاحبه بوده است. روایی صوری پرسش‌نامه توسط پانل متخصصان مورد تایید قرار گرفت. مطالعه راهنما در منطقه مشابه جامعه آماری با تعداد30 پرسش نامه صورت گرفت و با داده‌های کسب شده و استفاده از فرمول ویژه آلفای کرونباخ در نرم افزار SPSS، پایایی بخش‌های مختلف پرسش‌نامه تحقیق73/0 الی 82/0 بدست آمد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از مدل تحلیل عاملی استفاده شد و نتایج این مدل نشان داد مهم‌ترین عوامل بهبود معیشت پایدار از دیدگاه روستاییان در منطقه مورد مطالعه شامل چهار مولفه (کارآفرینی و تقویت زیرساخت اقتصادی، حمایت از طرف عرضه و اقدام مداخله ای دولت، تقویت سرمایه اجتماعی و توانمندسازی اجتماعی و مدیریت زیست محیطی و تقویت زیرساخت فیزیکی) است که مقدار واریانس و واریانس تجمعی تبیین شده توسط این چهار عامل 66/60 می‌باشد. و در نهایت، بر اساس نتایج تحقیق پیشنهادات کاربردی ارائه شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Factors Improvement of Sustainable livelihoods from the Perspective of Local People, Case Study: Ardabil County

نویسندگان English

vakil heidari sarban 1
Alireza Abdpour 2
1 university of mohaghegh ardabili
2 university of mohaghegh ardabili
چکیده English

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the factors improvement of sustainable livelihoods from the perspective of local people of Ardabil County. First, factors affecting effectiveness improvement of sustainable livelihoods in the study area were identified from the perspective of local elites using semi-structured interviews. To achieve this goal, 35 residents of studied region were interviewed individually with college education and at least a bachelor's degree. In the second step of study, in order to understand and analyze rural communities' perspective of and their theoretical agreement degree with the results of the first step, 39 identified causes were the questionnaire design basis by Likert method. It can be said that studied population in this study consists of all villagers living in rural areas of Ardabil County in 2016 (N= 85053), among which 383 persons were selected as statistical sample using Cochran formula. In order to analyze the data, factor analysis model was used and the results of this model showed the most important factor improvement of sustainable livelihoods from the perspective of local people in studied region includes four components (entrepreneurship and fortification of economical infrastructures, support of demand- side and governmental interventional action, fortification of social capital and social empowerment and environmental management and fortification of physical infrastructures) that explained variance and the cumulative variance by the five factors 60.66. And finally, practical suggestions have been presented according to the results of the study.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sustainable livelihoods
rural development
sustainable development
Ardabil County
Amaral Porsani, J. (2010). Understanding the impact of water aces for lives and livelihods in rural Sahel. M.Sc. Thesis, Stockholm University, Sweden
Babulo, B., Muys, B., Nega, F., Tollens, E., Nyssen, J., Deckers, J.f, & Mathijs, E., (2008), Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia, Agricultural Systems, 98(2), 147-155.
Balgis, O. E. (2004). Sustainable livelihood approach for assessing community’s resilience to climate variability and change: A case study from Sudan. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Climate Impacts Assessment (SICCIA), Grainau, Germany.
Butler LM and Mazur RE (2009). Principles and processes for enhancing sustainable rural livelihoods: Collaborative learning in Uganda. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 14(6), 604-617
Cahn, M. (2002). The business of living: Rural micro-enterprise and sustainable livelihoods (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Carney, D. (1999). Livelihood approaches compared: A brief comparison of the livelihoods approaches of DFID, CARE, Oxfam, and UNDP. London: Department for International Development (DFID).
Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts?, Environment and Urbanization, 7(1): 173-204.
Chambers, R. (2006). Ideas for development. Earth Scan Publication, London, Sterling VA.
Chambers, R. and Conway, G. R. (1992). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century, Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex Brighton.
Chambers, Robert. (1987). Sustainable livelihood and development: Putting poor rural people first. Institute of development studies.
Chen, H., Shivakoti, G., Zhu, T., & Maddox, D. (2012). Livelihood sustainability and community based co-management of forest resources in China: Changes and improvement. Environmental Management, 49(1), 219–228.
Cherni, J. A., & Hill, Y. (2010). Energy and policy providing for sustainable rural livelihoods in remote locations e the case of Cuba. Geoforum, 40, 645e654.
Dearden, Philip & Roland, Reachal & Alison & Allen Catherine (2002). Sustainable Livehood Approaches from the work to the field supporting Livehoods. Oxford: University of oxford.
DFID, (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets: Department for International Development (DFID).
Elis, F., and Bigs, S. (2001). Evolving themes in rural development 1950s-200s. Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Instiute, Published by Blackwel Publishers, 19, 437-48.
Eddins, E (2013), a sustianble livelihoods approach to volunteer tourism: the roles of the host community and an alternative break program in Achiote, Panama, Thesis For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Colorado State University
Ferguson, J (2012), generating sustanible livelihoods, the role of co-operatvies, Harnessing the Co‐operative Advantage to Build a Better World, September 4‐6, Canadian Co‐operative Association .
Gangwar, L. S., Saran, S., & Kumar, S. (2013). Integrated Poultry-Fish farming system for sustainable rural livelihood security in Kuma on hills of Uttarakhand. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 26(1): 181-188.
Helmor, C., and Sing, N. (2001). Sustainable livelihood: building on the wealth of the poor. Bloomfield: Kumarin Press.
Holden, A. (2002). Environment and Tourism, Harlow: Routledge.
Ian, S (2015), Sustainable rural livelihoods and rural development. UK: Practical Action Publishing and Winnipeg, CA: Fernwood Publishing. 2 (5), 120- 145.
Koeberlein, M. (2011). Living from waste: livelihood of the actors involved in Delhi’s recycling economy, Saarbrucken (Germany): Verlag fur Entwicklungspolitik.
Krantz, L (2005), the Sustainable Livelihood Approach to Poverty Reduction An Introduction, SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY.
Lienert,J and Burger, P (2015), Merging capabilities and livelihoods: analyzing the use of biological resources to improve well-being, Ecology and Society, 20 (2), 1-20.
Narain,U., Gupta., S & Vant, K., (2008). Poverty and the environment: exploiting the relationship between household incomes, private assets, and natural assets. Land Economics. Wisconsin.
Scoones, L (2010), Livelihoods perspectives and rural development, Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 12-35.
Serrat, O ., (2008). The sustainable Livehoods Approach. Manila A D B.
Shen, F. (2009). Tourism and sustainable livelihoods approach: Application within the Chinese context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lincoln University, USA.
Singh, P. K., and Hiremath, B.N. (2010). Sustainable livelihod security index in a developing country: A tol for development planing. Ecological Indicators, 10, 42–451.
Tang, Q., Bennet, S., Xu, Y and Li, Y (2013), Agricultural practices and sustainable livelihoods: Rural transformation within the Loess Plateau, China, Applied Geography, 4(1), 15-23 .
Tong. Q., Bennett, S., Xu, Y and Li, Y., (2013), Agricultural practices and sustainable livelihoods: Rural transformation within the Loess Plateau, China, Applied Geography Journal, 4(1), 15-23 .
Xu, D., Zhang, J., Rasul, G., Liu, Sh., Xie, F., Cao, M and Liu, E (2015), Household livelihood strategies and dependence on agriculture in the mountainous settlements in the three gorges reservoir Area, China, Sustainability Journal, 7 (2), 4850- 4869.