Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Applied Research in Geographical Sciences

Spatial analysis of Shiraz urban areas in terms of social justice with an emphasis on public services

Authors
Mohamad hadi Setavand
Fazel Hajizadeh
Hosin Yaghfoori
10.29252/jgs.19.52.171
Abstract
Urban Public Service structuring the form and nature of the physical, social and spatial city; Therefore injustice in how to distribute it, the structure, on nature of the city and class segregation affects urban areas and Urban management is faced with serious challenges. In the same vein, the main purpose of this study, Spatial analysis of enjoyment levels ten main areas of the Shiraz city of Urban service. The research method is descriptive-analytical and its type is practical. In collecting data library method and field has been used. The statistical population of ten main areas of the Shiraz city that according to the 10 overall index and 49 components crucial public services Assessed. For analysis and grading the urban districts from the view point of enjoing public services, some models including Fuzzy TOPSIS, VIKOR and WASPAS have been used and for reaching to a unified result in data analysis of different models, the blended average of ranks has been used. The results of this method showed that Areas 1, 2 and 4 have in the first rank, areas 3, 6 and 7 in the category semi, Districts 8 and 10 low Enjoyment and Zones 5 and 9 enjoyment been lacking in class. The findings of this study show that the distribution of public services in areas of City Shiraz with Spatial justice approach does not match .At the end of this article, strategies according to research findings been proposed.
Keywords
Utilities
Social Inequality
Average Rating
metropolitan Shiraz
42. Dadashpoor, H., Rostami, f., Alizadeh, bahram (2016), Is inequality in the distribution of urban facilities inequitable? Exploring a method for indetifying spatial inequity in an iranian city, Cities, volume 52, pp 159-172.
43. Delbosec, A. and G., Currie (2011), Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity, Journal of Transport Geography, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1252-1259.
44. Dixon, J. and Ramutsindela, M. (2006), Urban resttlement and environmental justice in Cape Town, Cities, Volume 23, pp 129-139.
45. Gaffron, Ph. (2012), Urban transport, environmental justice and human daily activity patterns, Transport Policy, Volume 20, pp 114-127.
46. Gray, R., (2002), Social Accounting project and Accounting Organization and Society privileging Engagement, Imaging new Accounting and pragmatism over critique, Accounting, Organization and Society, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 687-708.
47. Kaphle, I. (2006), Evaluating people,s accessibility to bublic parks using Geographic Information systems: A case study in Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University, USA.
48. Martinez, J., (2009), The use of Gis and indicators to monitor intra-urban inequalities. A case study in Rosari, Argentina, Habitat International, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 387-396.
49. Stillwell, J., Norman, p., Claudia, T., Paula, S., (2010), Spatial and social disparities, Understanding Population Trends and Processes, 2, pp 1-15.
50. Taleai, M., Sliuzas, R., Flacke, j. (2014), An intergrated framework to evaluate the equity of urban public facilities using spatial multi-criteria analysis, Cities, Volume 40, part A, pp 56-69.
51. Tsou, K. W. Hung, Y. T. Chang, Y. T. Chang, Y. L (2005), An accessibility-based intergrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities, Cities, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 424-435.