تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی

بررسی تاثیر ابعاد کالبدی - فضایی بر پیاده‌مداری در شهر تهران (نمونه موردی: محلات امیرآباد و دانشگاه تهران)

نویسندگان
احمد پور احمد
نبی مرادپور
حسین حاتمی نژاد
دانشگاه تهران
10.29252/jgs.18.51.1
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش بررسی تأثیر ابعاد کالبدی – فضایی بر پیاده­مداری در محلات امیرآباد و دانشگاه تهران از منطقه 6 شهر تهران است. روش تحقیق پژوهش حاضر توصیفی- تحلیلی و پیمایشی است. و از ابزار پرسشنامه برای کسب نظر شهروندان استفاده شده است. جامعه آماری تحقیق را، کلیه ساکنان محلات امیرآباد و دانشگاه تهران تشکیل می­دهند، که به صورت تصادفی با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 384 نمونه انتخاب شده است. نگارندگان برای دقیق‌تر شدن نتایج تحقیق، حجم نمونه را به 400 نفر افزایش داده‏اند. برای تحلیل داده‏ها از نرم­افزارهای SPSS21 و LISREL8 استفاده شده است. نتایج تحقیق نشان دهنده این است که بین ابعاد کالبدی – فضایی و ترغیب پیاده­روی رابطه وجود دارد. همچنین مقدار بارهای عاملی به دست آمده در تمام شاخص­های تحقیق نشانگر این است که شاخص­های انتخاب شده برای سنجش ابعاد کالبدی فضایی ترغیب پیاده­روی به درستی این ابعاد را می­سنجند؛ به طوریکه در بین ابعاد کالبدی، شاخص ایمنی با(99/0) و در بین ابعاد فضایی شاخص امنیت با(75/0) بیشترین مقدار بار عاملی را دارا بوده­اند. علاوه بر این، تأثیر ابعاد کالبدی و فضایی بر ترغیب پیاده­روی مستقیم و مثبت می­باشد به طوریکه ابعاد کالبدی 34/0 و بعد فضایی نیز 42/0 از واریانس ترغیب پیاده­روی را تبیین نموده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
پیاده مداری
ابعاد کالبدی – فضایی
ترغیب پیاده روی
نرم افزارهای SPSS21 و LISREL8

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the impact of physical dimensions - space to encourage walking in Tehran (Case Study: neighborhood Amirabad and Daneshgah Tehran)

نویسندگان English

ahmad pourahmad
nabi moradpour
hossen hataminejad
Professor of Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Tehran University, Iran.
چکیده English

This study examined the effect of physical dimensions - space to encourage walking in Tehran. Micro level and macro level of the position of the subject matter, the authors were forced to Amirabad area of Tehran University as an area of study of their choice. The research method is analytical and survey. And the questionnaire for citizens was used. The population of the study, all residents of the neighborhood Amirabad and up Tehran University, using a sample of 384 randomly selected examples. The writers for more accurate research results, the sample size has been increased to 400. For data analysis software is used SPSS21 and LISREL8. The results indicate that the physical dimensions - space and encourage walking there. The amount of factor loadings obtained in all the research indicates that the selected indicators to measure the physical dimensions of space, encourage walking properly measure these dimensions, so that the physical dimensions, safety index (99/0 ) and the spatial dimensions of the security indicator (75/0) have had the highest amount of loadings. In addition, the effect of spatial scale on a direct and positive are encouraged to walk in space as well as the physical dimensions of 34/0 and 42/0 of variance explained that encourage walking.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

walking
physical dimensions - space
encourage walking
software SPSS21 and LISREL8
Alfonzo, M. A. (2005). ‘To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs.’ Environment and Behaviour 37: 808-836.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., Tiesdell, S., 2003.Public Places,Urban Spaces. The dimension of urban design. Burlington, USA: Architectural Press.
CNU & HUD,” Principles for inner city neighborhood design”, 2000
Engwicht, David(1993), Reclaiming Our Cities and Town: Better Living with Less Traffic, New Society publishers.
Gefen, D., Strub, D. and Boudrean, M. (2000); “Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice”; Communication of AIs, Vol. 7, pp. 1-78.
Halprin, Lawrence (1972), “Cities”, the MIT Press, Massachusetts.
Handy, S., Xinyu, C., Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior: Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part. 427-444
Hansen Walter, G. (1959), How Accessibility Shapes Land Use, Journal of the American Institute of Planers, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 73-76.
Hoppenbrouwer, Eric, E. Louw, (2005), Mixed-use Development: Theory and Practice in Amsterdam’s Eastern Docklands, European Planning Studies, Vol. 13, No. 7, p.p. 967-983.
Hutabarat Lo, R. (2009). Walkability: What is it?. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 2(2), 145 – 166.
Jacobs, Jane 1969. The death and Life of Great American Cities. The Modern Library. New York
Juriah Zakaria and Norsidah Ujang,(2014), Comfort of Walking in the City Center of Kuala Lumpur, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 170 ( 2015 ) 642 – 652.
Juriah Zakaria and Norsidah Ujang,(2014), Comfort of Walking in the City Center of Kuala Lumpur, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 170 ( 2015 ) 642 – 652.
Kaltenborn, B.P. (1998), Effects of sense of place on responses to .environmental impact: a case study among residents in an Arctic community, Applied Geography, 18(2): 169-189.
Kumar, R. (2010). Walkability of neighborhoods: a critical analysis of the role played by zoning codes in creating a walkable environment. Germany: LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Litman, T. (2004). Economic Value of Walkability. World Transport Policy and Practice, 10(1), 5-14.
Lehrer, Jim,”What is New Urbanism: www.Newurbanism.org, 2004.
Newman, O. (1996). Creating Defensible Space. Center of Urban Policy Research, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Office of Policy Development and Research. Diane Publishing.
Nozzi, Dom,” Merits and principles of New Urbanism”, http://user.gru.net/domz/ merits.htm, 2005.
Parks, J.R. & Schofer, J. L. (2006). ‘Characterizing neighborhood pedestrian environments with secondary data.’ Transportation Research Part D 11 250–263.
Rapoport, A. (1980), Pedestrian Street Use, Culture & Perception , Edited by Anne Vernez Moudon Colombia University Press, New York.
Rowley, A., (1996), Mixed-use development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking, Planning Practice and Research, Vol.11, No. 1, p.p. 85–97.
Sarkar, S. (2002). ‘Qualitative Evaluation of Comfort Needs in Urban Walkways in Major Activity Centers.’ Committee on Major Activity Center Circulation Systems. Transportation Research Board, 2003.
Shamai,S. (1991), Sense of place: an empirical measurement, Isreael .geoforum, Vol.22, pp: 347-358.
Speiregen, Paul (1960), “The Architecture of Towns and Cities”, The American Institute of Architecture.
Song, Y., Gerrit-Jan Knaap (2004). "Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values", Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 34, No. 6, p.p. 663-680.
Southworth, M. (2005). ‘Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development’ 131: 246-257.
Tuan, Y. F.(1980), Rootedness versus sense of place, Landscape .No. 24, 3-8.
Vojnovic, I. (2006). ‘Building Communities to Promote Physical Activities: a multi-scale geographical analysis.’ Journal Compilation of Geographical Analysis 88(B) I: 67-90.
Vreeker, Ron, Henri L.F. De Groot and Erik T. Verhoef, (2004), Urban Multifunctional Land Use: Theoretical and Empirical Insights on Economies of Scale, Scope and Diversity, Built Environment, Vol.30, No. 4, p.p. 289- 307.
www.newurbanism.org